More
Teplice - Sigma Olomouc 22.02.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
3
1st HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
0.96
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2.2
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Teplice
Sigma Olomouc
![Sigma Olomouc]()
4 wins
6 draws
5 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Teplice
Sigma Olomouc
![Sigma Olomouc]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Match facts
The most common result of matches between FK Teplice and SK Sigma Olomouc when FK Teplice is playing at home is 1-0. 5 matches have ended with this result.
The most common result of matches between FK Teplice and SK Sigma Olomouc is 0-0. 8 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 23 meetings with FK Teplice playing at home, FK Teplice have won 10 times, there have been 9 draws while SK Sigma Olomouc have won 4 times. The goal difference is 29-20 in favour of FK Teplice.
During the last 46 meetings, FK Teplice have won 13 times, there have been 18 draws while SK Sigma Olomouc have won 15 times. The goal difference is 57-48 in favour of SK Sigma Olomouc.
SK Sigma Olomouc's last away win against FK Teplice was in 2020.
Show more
Teplice
DRAW
Sigma Olomouc
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Teplice
No goal
34%
Sigma Olomouc
Predictions
The upcoming Czech Republic 1. Liga tournament includes a match between Teplice and Sigma Olomouc which will take place on 22.02 at 09:30. Sports bettors can find handy tips for this match by using the statistical analysis and predictions of the teams.
7 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Teplice did not draw
7 / 10 of last matches in 1. Liga Teplice did not draw
6 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended in a win
8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Sigma Olomouc did not draw
8 / 10 of last matches in 1. Liga Sigma Olomouc did not draw
7 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Teplice did not lose
Standings
1. Liga 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 |
Slovan Liberec
|
30 | 46 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 43:30 |
| 7 |
Sigma Olomouc
|
30 | 43 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 34:34 |
| 8 |
Pardubice
|
30 | 41 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 39:46 |
| 12 |
Zlin
|
30 | 34 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 37:48 |
| 13 |
Teplice
|
30 | 29 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 29:38 |
| 14 |
Dukla Prague
|
30 | 23 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 20:42 |
Hradec Kralove
Viktoria Plzen
1. Slovacko
Banik Ostrava
1. Liga 25/26, Relegation Round
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Teplice
|
35 | 42 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 40:42 |
| 2 |
Zlin
|
35 | 41 | 11 | 8 | 16 | 43:56 |
| 3 |
Mlada Boleslav
|
35 | 40 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 49:57 |
Other matches of round
Match info
09:30
Sunday 22 February 2026
Czech Republic, Teplice,
AGC Arena Na Stinadlech
Referee
Orel Pavel
Czech Republic
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Starting
Teplice
Substitutes
Manager
-
Frtala Z.
-
Janotka T.
Teplice
Sigma Olomouc
![Sigma Olomouc]()
Main Stats
0.96
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2.2
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
0.34
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
2.95
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.61
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.4
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
2.95
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.34
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.05
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-0.66
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Teplice
Sigma Olomouc
![Sigma Olomouc]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yasser Nour M.
Forward
|
8.4 | 65 | 1 | 0.6 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 9/10(90%) | - | - |
|
Slavicek F.
Midfielder
|
8.1 | 90 | 1 | 0.12 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 23/34(68%) | - | - |
|
Ghali Abubakar A.
Midfielder
|
8 | 45 | 1 | 0.73 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 3/6(50%) | - | - |
|
Janosek D.
Midfielder
|
7.8 | 89 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 36/42(86%) | - | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
7.7 | 18 | - | 0.09 | 1 | 0.12 | 3 | 2/2(100%) | - | - |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
7.3 | 29 | 1 | 0.2 | - | - | 2 | 8/11(73%) | - | - |
|
Spacil J.
Midfielder
|
7.1 | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | 5/7(71%) | - | - |
Sejk V.
Forward
|
7.1 | 90 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 0.1 | 2 | 9/13(69%) | - | - |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
7 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.01 | 3 | 19/28(68%) | - | - |
|
Barath P.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 69 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 15/24(63%) | - | - |
|
Hadas M.
Defender
|
6.9 | 45 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/13(46%) | - | - |
|
Sylla A.
Defender
|
6.8 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 39/46(85%) | - | - |
|
Elbel J.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 25/34(74%) | - | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
6.7 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 33/40(83%) | - | - |
|
Jukl R.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/7(86%) | - | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
6.7 | 45 | - | 0.1 | - | - | 1 | 7/8(88%) | - | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
6.5 | 61 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 11/15(73%) | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
6.5 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 19/26(73%) | - | - |
|
Koutny J.
Goalkeeper
|
6.4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 11/26(42%) | - | - |
|
Jakubko J.
Defender
|
6.4 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 31/42(74%) | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
6.4 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.06 | - | 9/15(60%) | 1 | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
6.3 | 45 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.1 | 3 | 12/19(63%) | - | - |
|
Rusek A.
Forward
|
6.3 | 25 | - | 0.19 | - | - | 1 | 3/4(75%) | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
6.2 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 15/32(47%) | - | - |
|
Slama J.
Defender
|
6.1 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 14/24(58%) | 1 | - |
|
Zlatohlavek T.
Midfielder
|
6 | 72 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 13/23(57%) | - | - |
|
Mikulenka M.
Forward
|
5.8 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 7/10(70%) | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
5.7 | 61 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 8/14(57%) | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
4.7 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 10/15(67%) | - | - |
|
Maly M.
Defender
|
- | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 3 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.04 | - | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.23 | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Sejk V.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Ghali Abubakar A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.98 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Janosek D.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Rusek A.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.16 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Slavicek F.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.76 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sylla A.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Yasser Nour M.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.99 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Zlatohlavek T.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.07 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Barath P.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Elbel J.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hadas M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jakubko J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jukl R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Koutny J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Maly M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mikulenka M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Slama J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Spacil J.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sejk V.
Forward
|
5 | 9/13(69%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.1 | 3/4(75%) | 28 | - | 1/4(25%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
4 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.12 | 1/1(100%) | 11 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
4 | 12/19(63%) | - | - | - | 0.1 | 4/6(67%) | 42 | 1/1(100%) | 3/4(75%) | - | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
3 | 19/26(73%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 6/9(67%) | 42 | - | - | - | 4 | - |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
3 | 8/11(73%) | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | 16 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Slavicek F.
Midfielder
|
3 | 23/34(68%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 9/11(82%) | 62 | 1/9(13%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 2 | - |
|
Yasser Nour M.
Forward
|
3 | 9/10(90%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 22 | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 3 | 2 |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 19/28(68%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 10/14(71%) | 60 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Zlatohlavek T.
Midfielder
|
2 | 13/23(57%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 7/13(54%) | 39 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
1 | 11/15(73%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 7/10(70%) | 28 | - | 1/7(14%) | - | - | - |
|
Ghali Abubakar A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 3/6(50%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/2(50%) | 18 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
1 | 7/8(88%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 15 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
1 | 8/14(57%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/7(57%) | 20 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Rusek A.
Forward
|
1 | 3/4(75%) | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Slama J.
Defender
|
1 | 14/24(58%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 8/12(67%) | 39 | 2/7(29%) | 1/5(20%) | - | - | - |
|
Sylla A.
Defender
|
1 | 39/46(85%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/8(50%) | 57 | 4/9(44%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Barath P.
Midfielder
|
- | 15/24(63%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/7(86%) | 37 | 2/6(33%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Elbel J.
Midfielder
|
- | 25/34(74%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 52 | 1/7(14%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Hadas M.
Defender
|
- | 6/13(46%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 27 | 1/6(17%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
- | 33/40(83%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/8(75%) | 59 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Jakubko J.
Defender
|
- | 31/42(74%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/6(33%) | 65 | 3/8(38%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 2 | - |
|
Janosek D.
Midfielder
|
- | 36/42(86%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 7/11(64%) | 64 | 1/3(33%) | 1/7(14%) | 1/1(100%) | 4 | - |
|
Jukl R.
Midfielder
|
- | 6/7(86%) | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | 9 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Koutny J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 11/26(42%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 36 | 8/23(35%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Maly M.
Defender
|
- | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mikulenka M.
Forward
|
- | 7/10(70%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/4(75%) | 18 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
- | 9/15(60%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 4/7(57%) | 34 | - | 1/5(20%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Spacil J.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/7(71%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 15 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
- | 4/5(80%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 1/1(100%) | 17 | - | 1/3(33%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 15/32(47%) | - | - | - | - | 2/12(17%) | 43 | 6/23(26%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
- | 10/15(67%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/1(100%) | 21 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Slavicek F.
Midfielder
|
14 | 2/3(67%) | 7/11(64%) | 2 | 1/4(25%) | 2 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Yasser Nour M.
Forward
|
14 | 3/6(50%) | 6/8(75%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Zlatohlavek T.
Midfielder
|
13 | 3/4(75%) | 2/9(22%) | 3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
12 | 5/9(56%) | 3/3(100%) | - | - | 1 | 11 | - | - | - |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
12 | 5/5(100%) | 3/7(43%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
10 | 1/1(100%) | 4/10(40%) | 2 | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Janosek D.
Midfielder
|
9 | 2/3(67%) | 6/6(100%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
9 | 1/2(50%) | 4/7(57%) | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Elbel J.
Midfielder
|
8 | 1/2(50%) | 2/6(33%) | 3 | 1/1(100%) | - | 9 | - | - | - |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
7 | - | 1/4(20%) | 3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Sejk V.
Forward
|
7 | 2/4(50%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Jakubko J.
Defender
|
6 | 1/1(100%) | 4/5(80%) | 1 | - | - | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Barath P.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Hadas M.
Defender
|
5 | 1/1(100%) | 2/4(50%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mikulenka M.
Forward
|
5 | 1/2(33%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rusek A.
Forward
|
5 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
4 | 1/1(50%) | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
|
Ghali Abubakar A.
Midfielder
|
3 | 1/2(50%) | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Slama J.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Spacil J.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Jukl R.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sylla A.
Defender
|
2 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 2 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Koutny J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Maly M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.1 | 1 | 2.9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
|
Koutny J.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.66 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | - | 6 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the 1. Liga tournament, the teams Teplice and Sigma Olomouc will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Teplice - AGC Arena Na Stinadlech. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Czech Republic, 22 Feb 2026 at 09:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Teplice. Team line-up:
- : Trmal Matous
- : Svanda Josef
- : Jakubko Jakub
- : Bilek Michal
- : Zlatohlavek Tomas
- : Kozak Matyas
- : Halinsky Denis
- : Kodes Petr
- : Nyarko Benjamin
- : Vecerka Dalibor
- : Radosta Matej
- : Sylla Abdoulaye
- : Elbel Jakub
- : Koutny Jan
- : Slavicek Filip
- : Slama Jiri
- : Barath Peter
- : Janosek Dominik
- : Jezierski Jakub
- : Sejk Vaclav
- : Ghali Abubakar Ahmad
- : Yasser Nour Mohamed
Teplice vs. Sigma Olomouc match info: Tournament - 1. Liga. Match start date - 22 Feb 2026. Match start time - 09:30.
