More
Zlin - Teplice 12.05.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
2
:
1
1st HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
1.18
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2.82
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
3
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Zlin
Teplice
![Teplice]()
6 wins
2 draws
7 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Zlin
Teplice
![Teplice]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Match facts
The most common result of matches between FC Zlin and FK Teplice when FC Zlin is playing at home is 1-0. 4 matches have ended with this result.
The most common result of matches between FC Zlin and FK Teplice is 1-2. 10 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 18 meetings with FC Zlin playing at home, FC Zlin have won 11 times, there have been 2 draws while FK Teplice have won 5 times. The goal difference is 27-18 in favour of FC Zlin.
During the last 37 meetings, FC Zlin have won 13 times, there have been 5 draws while FK Teplice have won 19 times. The goal difference is 54-44 in favour of FK Teplice.
FK Teplice's last away win against FC Zlin was in 2020.
Show more
Zlin
DRAW
Teplice
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Zlin
No goal
34%
Teplice
Predictions
The Zlin vs Teplice match in the Czech Republic 1. Liga is set to begin on 12.05 at 11:30. For those interested in sports betting, they can use in-depth Zlin Teplice betting tips by analyzing the statistics and making a prediction for the match.
5 / 10 of her last matches Zlin in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Zlin in 1. Liga ended in defeat
1 / 10 of last matches Teplice in all tournaments ended with her victory
1 / 10 of last matches Teplice in 1. Liga ended with her victory
3 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Teplice
1 / 10 of last matches Zlin in all competitions ended in a draw
Standings
1. Liga 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 |
Mlada Boleslav
|
30 | 35 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 44:52 |
| 10 |
Bohemians 1905 Prague
|
30 | 36 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 26:35 |
| 12 |
Zlin
|
30 | 34 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 37:48 |
| 13 |
Teplice
|
30 | 29 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 29:38 |
| 14 |
Dukla Prague
|
30 | 23 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 20:42 |
| 15 |
1. Slovacko
|
30 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 26:45 |
Pardubice
Banik Ostrava
Sigma Olomouc
1. Liga 25/26, Relegation Round
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Teplice
|
35 | 42 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 40:42 |
| 2 |
Zlin
|
35 | 41 | 11 | 8 | 16 | 43:56 |
| 3 |
Mlada Boleslav
|
35 | 40 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 49:57 |
| 4 |
1. Slovacko
|
35 | 30 | 7 | 9 | 19 | 30:51 |
Other matches of round
Match info
11:30
Tuesday 12 May 2026
Czech Republic, Zlin,
Letna Stadion
Referee
Cerny Dalibor
Czech Republic
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Starting
Zlin
Substitutes
Manager
-
Cervenka B.
-
Frtala Z.
Zlin
Teplice
![Teplice]()
Main Stats
1.18
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2.82
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.39
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
2.91
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
1.08
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.03
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
3
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
2.91
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.39
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-1.09
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-0.61
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Zlin
Teplice
![Teplice]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
9.2 | 90 | 1 | 1.07 | 1 | 0.06 | 2 | 25/26(96%) | - | - |
|
Bartosak L.
Defender
|
7.7 | 65 | - | 0.08 | 1 | 0.36 | 1 | 16/19(84%) | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
7.7 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.09 | - | 12/15(80%) | - | - |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
7.6 | 28 | 1 | 0.93 | 1 | 0.48 | 1 | 6/9(67%) | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
7.6 | 77 | 1 | 0.08 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 21/29(72%) | - | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 90 | - | 0.34 | - | 0.05 | 2 | 23/33(70%) | - | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 71 | 1 | 0.07 | 1 | 0.02 | 1 | 9/15(60%) | - | - |
|
Cernin J.
Defender
|
7.4 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.42 | - | 56/70(80%) | 1 | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 33/43(77%) | - | - |
|
Poznar T.
Forward
|
6.9 | 66 | 1 | 0.55 | - | 0.02 | 2 | 8/10(80%) | 1 | - |
|
Marecek L.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 34/47(72%) | - | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 45 | - | 0.11 | - | 0.13 | 2 | 16/20(80%) | - | - |
|
Machalik D.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 90 | 1 | 0.34 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 12/19(63%) | - | - |
|
Audinis N.
Defender
|
6.6 | 45 | - | 0.05 | - | - | 1 | 11/14(79%) | - | - |
|
Kopecny M.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 25 | - | - | - | 0.07 | - | 14/17(82%) | - | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
6.6 | 62 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.48 | 1 | 8/17(47%) | - | - |
|
Fortelny J.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 13 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 3/3(100%) | - | - |
|
Kanu S.
Forward
|
6.1 | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
|
Pisoja M.
Defender
|
6.1 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 31/36(86%) | - | - |
|
Nombil C.
Midfielder
|
6 | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/9(67%) | 1 | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
5.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 23/33(70%) | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
5.8 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
|
Pesek J.
Forward
|
5.7 | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
5.7 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 32/40(80%) | - | - |
|
Krapka A.
Defender
|
5.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 54/63(86%) | - | - |
|
Ulbrich T.
Midfielder
|
5.6 | 70 | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 17/19(89%) | - | - |
|
Didiba Moudoumbou J.
Midfielder
|
5.6 | 82 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 16/26(62%) | - | - |
|
Cupak M.
Midfielder
|
5.5 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 31/34(91%) | - | - |
|
Penkevics K.
Midfielder
|
5.5 | 65 | - | 0.03 | - | - | 1 | 9/12(75%) | - | - |
|
Knobloch M.
Goalkeeper
|
5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 30/40(75%) | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
4.5 | 27 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 5/5(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Kalabiska J.
Defender
|
- | 8 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 3/5(60%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Kalabiska J.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Machalik D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.62 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Poznar T.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.82 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.99 | - | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
Audinis N.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Bartosak L.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.15 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Marecek L.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.57 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Penkevics K.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Pisoja M.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Cernin J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cupak M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Didiba Moudoumbou J.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Fortelny J.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kanu S.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Knobloch M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kopecny M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Krapka A.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nombil C.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pesek J.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ulbrich T.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
6 | 6/9(67%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.48 | 3/5(60%) | 20 | - | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
5 | 25/26(96%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.06 | 13/14(93%) | 45 | 3/3(100%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Machalik D.
Midfielder
|
4 | 12/19(63%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/8(75%) | 37 | 1/3(33%) | 1/6(17%) | 1/2(50%) | 5 | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
4 | 9/15(60%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.02 | 2/6(33%) | 23 | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - |
|
Kalabiska J.
Defender
|
3 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/2(50%) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Poznar T.
Forward
|
3 | 8/10(80%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 4/5(80%) | 24 | - | - | - | 3 | 1 |
|
Bartosak L.
Defender
|
2 | 16/19(84%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.36 | 8/10(80%) | 28 | 3/4(75%) | 1/4(25%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 23/33(70%) | - | 1 | - | 0.05 | 5/14(36%) | 55 | 1/7(14%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Kanu S.
Forward
|
2 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Audinis N.
Defender
|
1 | 11/14(79%) | - | - | - | - | 2/5(40%) | 23 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Cernin J.
Defender
|
1 | 56/70(80%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.42 | 13/24(54%) | 82 | 7/19(37%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
1 | 8/17(47%) | 1 | - | - | 0.48 | 2/9(22%) | 25 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Marecek L.
Midfielder
|
1 | 34/47(72%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 10/15(67%) | 64 | 1/6(17%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 2 | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
1 | 21/29(72%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7/14(50%) | 44 | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
1 | 5/5(100%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 4/4(100%) | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pisoja M.
Defender
|
1 | 31/36(86%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 6/7(86%) | 63 | 4/7(57%) | 1/4(25%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
1 | 12/15(80%) | - | - | - | 0.09 | 5/7(71%) | 33 | - | 2/2(100%) | 1/1(100%) | 2 | - |
|
Cupak M.
Midfielder
|
- | 31/34(91%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/6(83%) | 57 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Didiba Moudoumbou J.
Midfielder
|
- | 16/26(62%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 3/10(30%) | 57 | 2/6(33%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Fortelny J.
Midfielder
|
- | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/1(100%) | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
- | 33/43(77%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/11(55%) | 57 | 4/8(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 3 | - |
|
Knobloch M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 30/40(75%) | - | - | - | - | - | 45 | 8/18(44%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/6(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kopecny M.
Midfielder
|
- | 14/17(82%) | - | - | - | 0.07 | 4/5(80%) | 23 | 4/5(80%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Krapka A.
Defender
|
- | 54/63(86%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/8(63%) | 80 | 4/10(40%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Nombil C.
Midfielder
|
- | 6/9(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Penkevics K.
Midfielder
|
- | 9/12(75%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 22 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Pesek J.
Forward
|
- | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | 3 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
- | 16/20(80%) | - | - | - | 0.13 | 4/6(67%) | 44 | - | 1/3(33%) | 2/3(67%) | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 23/33(70%) | - | - | - | - | - | 41 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ulbrich T.
Midfielder
|
- | 17/19(89%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/6(100%) | 28 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
- | 32/40(80%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7/8(88%) | 48 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Halinsky D.
Defender
|
19 | 5/9(56%) | 6/10(60%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Cupak M.
Midfielder
|
15 | 1/3(33%) | 5/12(42%) | 1 | - | 5 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Machalik D.
Midfielder
|
14 | 1/3(33%) | 8/11(73%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Poznar T.
Forward
|
14 | 3/7(43%) | 3/7(43%) | 3 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Naprstek M.
Forward
|
13 | 1/2(50%) | 8/11(73%) | 1 | 1/5(20%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Vecerka D.
Defender
|
12 | 2/6(33%) | 2/6(33%) | 4 | 1/1(100%) | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Riznic M.
Midfielder
|
10 | 1/2(50%) | 5/8(63%) | 2 | 3/3(100%) | 2 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Cernin J.
Defender
|
9 | 4/4(100%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | - | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Didiba Moudoumbou J.
Midfielder
|
9 | - | 3/9(33%) | 3 | - | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Krapka A.
Defender
|
9 | 1/2(50%) | 3/7(43%) | 2 | 1/2(50%) | 2 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Marecek D.
Midfielder
|
9 | - | 2/7(29%) | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Bilek M.
Midfielder
|
8 | 1/1(100%) | 5/7(71%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Pulkrab M.
Forward
|
8 | 1/3(33%) | 1/5(20%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Svanda J.
Defender
|
8 | 1/1(100%) | 5/7(71%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Ulbrich T.
Midfielder
|
8 | - | 2/7(29%) | 3 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Nombil C.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 4/7(57%) | 1 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Marecek L.
Midfielder
|
6 | 1/1(100%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | - | 3 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Pisoja M.
Defender
|
6 | 1/2(50%) | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Radosta M.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kopecny M.
Midfielder
|
4 | 2/2(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Nyarko B.
Forward
|
4 | - | 1/3(33%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Penkevics K.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kalabiska J.
Defender
|
3 | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kanu S.
Forward
|
3 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kodes P.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kozak M.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pesek J.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Audinis N.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Bartosak L.
Defender
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Fortelny J.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Knobloch M.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trmal M.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.56 | - | 1.44 | 2 | - | 5 | - |
|
Knobloch M.
Goalkeeper
|
-1.21 | 1 | 2.79 | 4 | - | 4 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the 1. Liga tournament, the teams Zlin and Teplice will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Zlin - Letna Stadion. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Czech Republic, 12 May 2026 at 11:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Zlin. Team line-up:
- : Penkevics Kristers
- : Poznar Tomas
- : Bartosak Lukas
- : Knobloch Milan
- : Krapka Antonin
- : Machalik David
- : Ulbrich Tomas
- : Didiba Moudoumbou Joss
- : Cernin Jakub
- : Cupak Michal
- : Pisoja Marian
- : Naprstek Matej
- : Radosta Matej
- : Vecerka Dalibor
- : Halinsky Denis
- : Kozak Matyas
- : Riznic Matej
- : Audinis Nojus Vytis
- : Bilek Michal
- : Marecek Lukas
- : Trmal Matous
- : Marecek Daniel
Zlin vs. Teplice match info: Tournament - 1. Liga. Match start date - 12 May 2026. Match start time - 11:30.
