More
Petrojet - Pyramids 17.03.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
Statistics
0.22
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.5
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
3
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Petrojet
Pyramids
![Pyramids]()
4 wins
3 draws
6 wins
Head to head
Chat
Match facts
The most common result of matches between Petrojet FC and Pyramids FC is 0-2. 3 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 6 meetings with Petrojet FC playing at home, Petrojet FC have won 2 times, there have been 1 draws while Pyramids FC have won 3 times. The goal difference is 9-6 in favour of Pyramids FC.
During the last 12 meetings, Petrojet FC have won 4 times, there have been 3 draws while Pyramids FC have won 5 times. The goal difference is 22-20 in favour of Petrojet FC.
Petrojet FC's last home win against Pyramids FC was in 2016.
Pyramids FC have a winning streak of 5 matches away from home.
Show more
Petrojet
DRAW
Pyramids
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Petrojet
No goal
34%
Pyramids
Predictions
The upcoming Egypt Cup (Egypt) clash between Petrojet and Pyramids will be taking place on 17.03 at 15:30. Sports bettors can review detailed Petrojet v Pyramids betting tips and analysis of both teams' statistics to make an informed prediction for the match.
2 / 10 of the last matches Petrojet in all tournaments ended with a loss in the 2nd half
6 / 10 of the last matches Pyramids in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 2nd half
4 / 10 of the last matches between the teams ended with a victory Pyramids in the 2nd half
5 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Petrojet did not lose
2 / 2 of last matches in Egypt Cup Petrojet did not lose
Other matches of round
Match info
15:30
Tuesday 17 March 2026
Petrojet
Pyramids
![Pyramids]()
Main Stats
0.22
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.5
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
0.04
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.9
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.6
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.57
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
3
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
1.9
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.04
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.1
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.04
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
7.6 | 85 | - | - | - | 0.07 | - | 23/29(79%) | 1 | - |
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 17/27(63%) | - | - |
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 29/38(76%) | - | - |
El Sayed A.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 33 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 9/12(75%) | - | - |
Marie M.
Defender
|
6.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 42/49(86%) | - | - |
Mayele F.
Forward
|
6.3 | 90 | - | 0.11 | - | 0.02 | 2 | 8/18(44%) | 1 | - |
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
5.6 | 76 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 16/25(64%) | 1 | - |
Fathi M.
Forward
|
- | 5 | 1 | 0.16 | - | 0.12 | 1 | 2/3(67%) | - | - |
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
- | 4 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 3/4(75%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
El Sayed A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.16 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Fathi M.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.82 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
10 | 8/18(44%) | 1 | 1 | - | 0.02 | 5/12(42%) | 34 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
3 | 16/25(64%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7/11(64%) | 38 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Sayed A.
Midfielder
|
2 | 9/12(75%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/5(80%) | 23 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Fathi M.
Forward
|
2 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 1/2(50%) | 11 | - | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
- | 23/29(79%) | - | - | - | 0.07 | 4/7(57%) | 59 | 5/8(63%) | 1/6(17%) | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 17/27(63%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 8/14(57%) | 38 | 11/20(55%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
- | 3/4(75%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
- | 29/38(76%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/7(43%) | 53 | 4/8(50%) | - | 3/3(100%) | 3 | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
- | 42/49(86%) | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | 57 | 6/12(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
16 | - | 9/15(60%) | 4 | 2/3(67%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
12 | - | 2/10(20%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
8 | - | 2/7(29%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
8 | 1/4(25%) | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
El Sayed A.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 1/6(17%) | 4 | 1/1(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
5 | - | 2/5(40%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Fathi M.
Forward
|
5 | - | 1/5(20%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
0.04 | 2 | 0.04 | - | - | 5 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Egypt, 17 Mar 2026 at 15:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Petrojet. The football team Pyramids. The teams have played 13 of the games all the time. Of these, Petrojet won 4, and Pyramids won 6, with a total of 3 draw games.
Petrojet vs. Pyramids match info: Tournament - Egypt Cup. Match start date - 17 Mar 2026. Match start time - 15:30.
