More
ZED - Pyramids 10.05.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
1
Statistics
1.27
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.41
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
ZED
Pyramids
![Pyramids]()
0 wins
1 draws
8 wins
Head to head
Chat
Match facts
The most common result of matches between Zed FC and Pyramids FC is 0-1. 4 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 7 meetings, Zed FC have won 0 times, there have been 1 draws while Pyramids FC have won 6 times. The goal difference is 8-2 in favour of Pyramids FC.
Zed FC haven't lost in any of their last 6 home matches.
Zed FC haven't won any of their last 4 games against Pyramids FC.
Zed FC have scored at least one goal for 7 consecutive matches.
Show more
ZED
DRAW
Pyramids
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
ZED
No goal
34%
Pyramids
Predictions
The match between ZED and Pyramids, as part of the Egypt Cup (Egypt), is scheduled for 10.05 at 13:30. Betting enthusiasts can use the following analysis of teams' statistics and prediction to gain detailed insight into their betting decisions for the match.
3 / 10 of her last matches ZED in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Pyramids in all tournaments ended with her victory
4 / 5 of last matches Pyramids in Egypt Cup ended with her victory
7 / 8 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Pyramids
3 / 10 of the last matches Pyramids in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 1st half
4 / 5 of the last matches Pyramids in Egypt Cup ended with its victory in the 1st half
Match info
13:30
Sunday 10 May 2026
ZED
Pyramids
![Pyramids]()
Main Stats
1.27
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.41
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.9
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.16
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.4
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.79
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
1.16
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.9
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.16
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-0.1
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hafez K.
Defender
|
8.1 | 74 | 1 | 0.83 | 1 | 0.09 | 2 | 18/23(78%) | - | - |
Mayele F.
Forward
|
8 | 74 | 1 | 0.24 | - | 0.06 | 5 | 4/7(57%) | - | - |
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
7.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 29/35(83%) | 1 | - |
Chibi M.
Defender
|
7.2 | 84 | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | 23/31(74%) | - | - |
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.1 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 11/20(55%) | - | - |
Marie M.
Defender
|
7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 34/42(81%) | - | - |
Alaa T.
Defender
|
6.7 | 89 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 22/35(63%) | 1 | - |
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.01 | - | - | 1 | 29/35(83%) | 1 | - |
|
El Karti W.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 20/30(67%) | - | - |
Saber M.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 90 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 33/45(73%) | 1 | - |
Abdelhamid M.
Forward
|
5.8 | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
- | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Tawfik A.
Midfielder
|
- | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
5 | 3 | 1.01 | 2 | - | 1 | 3 | 2 |
|
Hafez K.
Defender
|
2 | 2 | 0.78 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Saber M.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Abdelhamid M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Alaa T.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Karti W.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tawfik A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
5 | 4/7(57%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 3/4(75%) | 17 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Hafez K.
Defender
|
2 | 18/23(78%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.09 | 1/4(33%) | 39 | 3/8(38%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Alaa T.
Defender
|
1 | 22/35(63%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 9/17(53%) | 54 | 4/8(50%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
1 | 23/31(74%) | - | - | - | 0.1 | 3/8(38%) | 49 | 3/7(43%) | 1/7(14%) | - | - | - |
|
El Karti W.
Midfielder
|
1 | 20/30(67%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 6/9(67%) | 37 | 1/4(25%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
1 | 29/35(83%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/10(50%) | 46 | 8/12(67%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Saber M.
Midfielder
|
1 | 33/45(73%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7/12(58%) | 58 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Abdelhamid M.
Forward
|
- | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 11/20(55%) | - | - | - | - | 2/7(29%) | 31 | 6/15(40%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
- | 29/35(83%) | - | - | - | - | 2/5(40%) | 41 | 4/8(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
- | 34/42(81%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 52 | 4/9(44%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Tawfik A.
Midfielder
|
- | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Alaa T.
Defender
|
13 | 3/5(60%) | 6/8(75%) | 1 | 4/4(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
El Karti W.
Midfielder
|
10 | 3/5(60%) | 2/5(40%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Mayele F.
Forward
|
6 | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Chibi M.
Defender
|
5 | - | 1/4(25%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Hamid Toeima O.
Defender
|
5 | 2/3(67%) | - | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Lasheen M.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Abdelhamid M.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Hafez K.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Marie M.
Defender
|
3 | 1/2(50%) | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Saber M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Tawfik A.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Al Fakhouri A.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
El Shenawy A.
Goalkeeper
|
0.16 | 3 | 1.16 | 1 | - | 3 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Egypt, 10 May 2026 at 13:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team ZED. The football team Pyramids.
ZED vs. Pyramids match info: Tournament - Egypt Cup. Match start date - 10 May 2026. Match start time - 13:30.
