More
Wil 1900 - Xamax 07.04.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
3
:
2
Statistics
3.46
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.57
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
7
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Wil 1900
Xamax
![Xamax]()
10 wins
4 draws
1 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Wil 1900
Xamax
![Xamax]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Challenge League
Match facts
The most common result of matches between FC Wil 1900 and Neuchatel Xamax when FC Wil 1900 is playing at home is 2-0. 5 matches have ended with this result.
The most common result of matches between FC Wil 1900 and Neuchatel Xamax is 2-0. 6 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 22 meetings with FC Wil 1900 playing at home, FC Wil 1900 have won 14 times, there have been 4 draws while Neuchatel Xamax have won 4 times. The goal difference is 36-19 in favour of FC Wil 1900.
During the last 44 meetings, FC Wil 1900 have won 20 times, there have been 10 draws while Neuchatel Xamax have won 14 times. The goal difference is 72-67 in favour of FC Wil 1900.
Neuchatel Xamax's last away win against FC Wil 1900 was in 2018.
Show more
Wil 1900
DRAW
Xamax
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Wil 1900
No goal
34%
Xamax
Predictions
The match between Wil 1900 and Xamax, as part of the Challenge League (Switzerland), is scheduled for 07.04 at 13:30. Betting enthusiasts can use the following analysis of teams' statistics and prediction to gain detailed insight into their betting decisions for the match.
2 / 10 of last matches Wil 1900 in all tournaments ended with her victory
2 / 10 of last matches Wil 1900 in Challenge League ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Wil 1900
5 / 10 of her last matches Xamax in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Xamax in Challenge League ended in defeat
2 / 10 of the last matches Wil 1900 in all tournaments ended with its victory in the 2nd half
Standings
Challenge League 25/26
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
Stade Lausanne-Ouchy
|
36 | 50 | 14 | 8 | 14 | 59:51 |
| 5 |
Xamax
|
36 | 49 | 14 | 7 | 15 | 55:56 |
| 6 |
Rapperswil-Jona
|
36 | 44 | 14 | 2 | 20 | 52:62 |
| 7 |
Etoile
|
36 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 46:54 |
| 8 |
Wil 1900
|
36 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 39:55 |
| 9 |
Stade Nyonnais
|
36 | 28 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 33:60 |
Yverdon Sport
Other matches of round
Match info
13:30
Tuesday 07 April 2026Referee
Qovanaj Hajrim
Switzerland
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Starting
Wil 1900
Substitutes
Manager
-
Hammerli M.
-
Braizat A.
Wil 1900
Xamax
![Xamax]()
Main Stats
3.46
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.57
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
4.88
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.86
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
2.05
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.6
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
7
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
0.86
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
4.88
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-1.14
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-0.12
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Wil 1900
Xamax
![Xamax]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Challenge League
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Breedijk L.
Forward
|
9.2 | 73 | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.17 | 2 | 16/21(76%) | - | - |
Dalipi L.
Midfielder
|
9 | 90 | 1 | 0.04 | - | 0.14 | 1 | 48/57(84%) | - | - |
Kone K.
Forward
|
7.7 | 90 | 1 | 0.25 | - | 0.01 | 5 | 16/21(76%) | - | - |
Ndau K.
Midfielder
|
7.7 | 73 | 1 | 0.99 | - | 0.46 | 2 | 38/43(88%) | 1 | - |
Facchinetti M.
Defender
|
7.5 | 81 | - | - | 2 | 0.32 | - | 28/38(74%) | - | - |
Kaiba D.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 90 | 1 | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 39/47(83%) | - | - |
Jacovic D.
Midfielder
|
7.1 | 82 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 0.24 | 1 | 16/23(70%) | 1 | - |
Abedini E.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.33 | - | 34/43(79%) | 1 | - |
|
Mulaj L.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 65 | 1 | 0.03 | - | - | 1 | 13/17(76%) | - | - |
Demhasaj S.
Forward
|
6.8 | 90 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.64 | 1 | 14/22(64%) | - | - |
Schmid Y.
Defender
|
6.7 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.08 | - | 54/63(86%) | - | - |
Bunjaku O.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | 12/12(100%) | - | - |
|
Coulibaly P.
Forward
|
6.6 | 32 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
Muslija G.
Goalkeeper
|
6.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 27/34(79%) | - | - |
Hautier J.
Forward
|
6.4 | 25 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 6/7(86%) | - | - |
Sarho U.
Defender
|
6.4 | 58 | - | 0.29 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 5/8(63%) | - | - |
Seydoux L.
Defender
|
6.4 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.19 | - | 12/17(71%) | - | - |
Bohon Diet Y.
Defender
|
6.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.12 | - | 32/40(80%) | - | - |
Mendes D.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 25 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 8/11(73%) | - | - |
Bayard R.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 81 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 24/27(89%) | - | - |
Hajrulahu L.
Defender
|
5.8 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 35/41(85%) | 1 | - |
|
Hottiger T.
Goalkeeper
|
5.8 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 17/26(65%) | - | - |
Krasniqi J.
Defender
|
5.6 | 65 | - | 0.01 | - | - | 1 | 16/26(62%) | - | - |
Epitaux Y.
Defender
|
5.4 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | - | 1 | 31/37(84%) | 1 | - |
|
Diarra M.
Midfielder
|
- | 8 | - | 0.12 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 3/3(100%) | - | - |
|
Nwannah U.
Defender
|
- | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | 5/6(83%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kone K.
Forward
|
5 | 2 | 0.68 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
|
Breedijk L.
Forward
|
2 | 2 | 0.95 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Diarra M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Kaiba D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.56 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Ndau K.
Midfielder
|
2 | 2 | 1.54 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Sarho U.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Coulibaly P.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.08 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Dalipi L.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.28 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Demhasaj S.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.07 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Epitaux Y.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Hautier J.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Jacovic D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Krasniqi J.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Mulaj L.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.07 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Abedini E.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bayard R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bohon Diet Y.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bunjaku O.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Facchinetti M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hajrulahu L.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hottiger T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mendes D.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Muslija G.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nwannah U.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Schmid Y.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Seydoux L.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Breedijk L.
Forward
|
9 | 16/21(76%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.17 | 9/12(75%) | 42 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - |
|
Demhasaj S.
Forward
|
7 | 14/22(64%) | - | - | - | 0.64 | 5/9(56%) | 23 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Hautier J.
Forward
|
5 | 6/7(86%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 2/3(67%) | 14 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Kone K.
Forward
|
5 | 16/21(76%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/6(67%) | 36 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sarho U.
Defender
|
4 | 5/8(63%) | - | 1 | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 15 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Dalipi L.
Midfielder
|
2 | 48/57(84%) | - | - | - | 0.14 | 21/26(81%) | 87 | 3/4(75%) | 2/3(67%) | 1/1(100%) | 3 | - |
|
Diarra M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 3/3(100%) | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Epitaux Y.
Defender
|
2 | 31/37(84%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 51 | 2/6(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Jacovic D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 16/23(70%) | - | - | 1 | 0.24 | 10/14(71%) | 34 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Ndau K.
Midfielder
|
2 | 38/43(88%) | 2 | 1 | - | 0.46 | 6/9(67%) | 58 | - | 2/6(33%) | - | - | - |
|
Abedini E.
Midfielder
|
1 | 34/43(79%) | - | - | - | 0.33 | 7/13(54%) | 54 | 3/7(43%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Bohon Diet Y.
Defender
|
1 | 32/40(80%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 8/15(53%) | 58 | 2/4(50%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Coulibaly P.
Forward
|
1 | 4/6(67%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 13 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Hajrulahu L.
Defender
|
1 | 35/41(85%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 5/8(63%) | 52 | 4/9(44%) | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - |
|
Mendes D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 8/11(73%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 18 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Mulaj L.
Midfielder
|
1 | 13/17(76%) | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | 33 | 2/3(67%) | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Schmid Y.
Defender
|
1 | 54/63(86%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 7/9(78%) | 74 | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Seydoux L.
Defender
|
1 | 12/17(71%) | - | - | - | 0.19 | 4/7(57%) | 31 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Bayard R.
Midfielder
|
- | 24/27(89%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 6/7(86%) | 39 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 4 | - |
|
Bunjaku O.
Midfielder
|
- | 12/12(100%) | - | - | - | - | 4/4(100%) | 20 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Facchinetti M.
Defender
|
- | 28/38(74%) | - | - | 2 | 0.32 | 9/12(75%) | 58 | 9/12(75%) | 4/8(50%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Hottiger T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 17/26(65%) | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 5/14(36%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Kaiba D.
Midfielder
|
- | 39/47(83%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/10(60%) | 60 | 4/8(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Krasniqi J.
Defender
|
- | 16/26(62%) | - | - | - | - | 2/8(25%) | 51 | 1/4(25%) | - | 1/3(33%) | - | - |
|
Muslija G.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 27/34(79%) | - | - | - | - | 1/7(14%) | 42 | 6/12(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Nwannah U.
Defender
|
- | 5/6(83%) | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | 9 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Breedijk L.
Forward
|
13 | 2/3(67%) | 7/10(70%) | 1 | 3/3(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Dalipi L.
Midfielder
|
13 | - | 9/12(75%) | 1 | 5/5(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kone K.
Forward
|
12 | 5/9(56%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Epitaux Y.
Defender
|
11 | 3/8(38%) | - | 3 | - | - | 8 | - | - | - |
|
Krasniqi J.
Defender
|
11 | 2/3(67%) | 2/8(25%) | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Jacovic D.
Midfielder
|
10 | 1/4(25%) | 2/6(33%) | 3 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Bayard R.
Midfielder
|
9 | - | 8/9(89%) | - | 1/4(25%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Kaiba D.
Midfielder
|
9 | 4/6(67%) | - | 3 | - | - | 9 | - | - | - |
|
Schmid Y.
Defender
|
8 | 5/8(63%) | - | - | - | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Hautier J.
Forward
|
7 | 2/6(33%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mulaj L.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 4/7(57%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Seydoux L.
Defender
|
7 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Abedini E.
Midfielder
|
6 | 1/2(50%) | 2/4(50%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Demhasaj S.
Forward
|
6 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ndau K.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Sarho U.
Defender
|
5 | - | 1/4(25%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bohon Diet Y.
Defender
|
4 | - | 1/4(25%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 3 | 1 | - | - |
|
Coulibaly P.
Forward
|
4 | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hajrulahu L.
Defender
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - | 1 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Mendes D.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1/1(100%) | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Facchinetti M.
Defender
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Hottiger T.
Goalkeeper
|
3 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | - |
|
Bunjaku O.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Diarra M.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Muslija G.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Nwannah U.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hottiger T.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.12 | 6 | 4.88 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
|
Muslija G.
Goalkeeper
|
-1.14 | 3 | 0.86 | 2 | - | 3 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Switzerland, 07 Apr 2026 at 13:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Wil 1900. Team line-up:
- : Muslija Gentrit
- : Bohon Diet Yuro
- : Kaiba Djawal
- : Schmid Yannick
- : Schreiber Loris
- : Jacovic David
- : Ndau Kastrijot
- : Sarho Umar Saho
- : Dalipi Lutfi
- : Breedijk Luuk
- : Ndjoli Jean Paul
- : Hottiger Tim
- : Krasniqi Jetmir
- : Epitaux Yoan
- : Hajrulahu Lavdrim
- : Facchinetti Mickael
- : Azemi Altin
- : Bayard Romain
- : Abedini Eris
- : Mulaj Liridon
- : Kone Koro Issa Ahmed
- : Demhasaj Shkelqim
Wil 1900 vs. Xamax match info: Tournament - Challenge League. Match start date - 07 Apr 2026. Match start time - 13:30.
