More
K.V.C. Westerlo - Royale Union Saint-Gilloise 01.03.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
0
1st HALF
Statistics
0.9
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.42
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
K.V.C. Westerlo
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
![Royale Union Saint-Gilloise]()
2 wins
6 draws
7 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
K.V.C. Westerlo
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
![Royale Union Saint-Gilloise]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Pro League
Match facts
The most common result of matches between KVC Westerlo and Union Saint-Gilloise is 1-3. 4 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 12 meetings with KVC Westerlo playing at home, KVC Westerlo have won 4 times, there have been 1 draws while Union Saint-Gilloise have won 7 times. The goal difference is 26-17 in favour of Union Saint-Gilloise.
During the last 26 meetings, KVC Westerlo have won 6 times, there have been 7 draws while Union Saint-Gilloise have won 13 times. The goal difference is 45-28 in favour of Union Saint-Gilloise.
Last season's matches: 4-3 (KVC Westerlo at home) and 3-1 (Union Saint-Gilloise at home).
Did you know that KVC Westerlo scores 21% of their goals between the minutes 61-75?
Show more
K.V.C. Westerlo
DRAW
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
K.V.C. Westerlo
No goal
34%
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
Predictions
The match between K.V.C. Westerlo and Royale Union Saint-Gilloise, as part of the Pro League (Belgium), is scheduled for 01.03 at 10:00. Betting enthusiasts can use the following analysis of teams' statistics and prediction to gain detailed insight into their betting decisions for the match.
6 / 10 of last matches K.V.C. Westerlo in all competitions, at least one team did not score
6 / 10 of last matches K.V.C. Westerlo in Pro League, at least one team has not scored
1 / 10 of the last matches between the teams, at least one of the teams did not score
6 / 10 of last matches Royale Union Saint-Gilloise in all competitions, at least one team did not score
4 / 10 of last matches Royale Union Saint-Gilloise in Pro League, at least one team has not scored
3 / 10 of her last matches K.V.C. Westerlo in all competitions ended in defeat
Standings
Pro League 25/26, Championship Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Brugge
|
40 | 57 | 28 | 4 | 8 | 91:45 |
| 2 |
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
|
40 | 53 | 25 | 11 | 4 | 66:27 |
| 3 |
Sint-Truidense
|
40 | 43 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 61:46 |
Mechelen
Pro League 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
|
30 | 66 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 50:17 |
| 2 |
Brugge
|
30 | 63 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 59:36 |
| 3 |
Sint-Truidense
|
30 | 57 | 18 | 3 | 9 | 47:35 |
| 8 |
Standard Liege
|
30 | 40 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 27:35 |
| 9 |
K.V.C. Westerlo
|
30 | 39 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 36:40 |
| 10 |
Royal Antwerp
|
30 | 35 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 31:32 |
Genk
Zulte Waregem
Cercle Brugge
Gent
Pro League 25/26, Qualifying Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 |
R. Charleroi
|
40 | 34 | 14 | 9 | 17 | 50:50 |
| 4 |
K.V.C. Westerlo
|
40 | 33 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 50:57 |
| 5 |
Royal Antwerp
|
40 | 31 | 13 | 9 | 18 | 43:48 |
Other matches of round
Match info
10:00
Sunday 01 March 2026
Belgium, Westerlo,
Het Kuipje
Referee
Boterberg Jan
Belgium
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
K.V.C. Westerlo
4-2-3-1
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
3-4-2-1
Starting
K.V.C. Westerlo
Substitutes
Manager
-
Charai I.
-
Hubert D.
K.V.C. Westerlo
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
![Royale Union Saint-Gilloise]()
Main Stats
0.9
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.42
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
0.88
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.32
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.46
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.72
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
0.32
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.88
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.32
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.88
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
K.V.C. Westerlo
Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
![Royale Union Saint-Gilloise]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Pro League
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chambaere V.
Goalkeeper
|
8.3 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 18/21(86%) | - | - |
Mac Allister K.
Defender
|
8.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.08 | - | 57/66(86%) | 1 | - |
Piedfort A.
Defender
|
7.9 | 90 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.07 | 1 | 23/28(82%) | - | - |
Reynolds B.
Defender
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 25/34(74%) | - | - |
Zorgane A.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 90 | - | 0.19 | - | 0.11 | 1 | 60/76(79%) | - | - |
Jungdal A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 22/43(51%) | - | - |
Sykes R.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 52/55(95%) | - | - |
Burgess C.
Defender
|
7.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 80/90(89%) | 1 | - |
Haspolat D.
Midfielder
|
7.1 | 90 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.23 | 1 | 23/31(74%) | - | - |
Neustadter R.
Midfielder
|
7 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 37/38(97%) | - | - |
Alcocer J.
Forward
|
6.9 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.08 | 1 | 15/22(68%) | - | - |
Sayyad A.
Forward
|
6.6 | 90 | - | 0.49 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 19/31(61%) | - | - |
Ourega D.
Forward
|
6.5 | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/7(86%) | - | - |
Bayram E.
Defender
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.17 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 29/38(76%) | - | - |
Khalaili A.
Forward
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.27 | 1 | 30/42(71%) | - | - |
Fuseini M.
Forward
|
6.3 | 88 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 8/11(73%) | - | - |
Giger M.
Forward
|
6.3 | 83 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 24/26(92%) | - | - |
Schoofs R.
Midfielder
|
6.3 | 66 | - | - | - | 0.2 | - | 26/33(79%) | 1 | - |
Smith G.
Forward
|
6.2 | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/7(57%) | - | - |
Sakamoto I.
Forward
|
6.1 | 45 | - | - | - | - | - | 8/9(89%) | - | - |
Van Den Keybus T.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/5(80%) | - | - |
Ferri N.
Forward
|
6 | 90 | - | 0.14 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 10/22(45%) | 1 | - |
Patris L.
Defender
|
6 | 66 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 16/18(89%) | - | - |
|
Zeneli B.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | 5/8(63%) | - | - |
Van De Perre K.
Midfielder
|
5.8 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.03 | 3 | 42/47(89%) | - | - |
Nsiala-Makengo C.
Defender
|
4.2 | 29 | - | - | - | - | - | 15/18(83%) | - | 1 |
|
Keita S.
Forward
|
- | 7 | - | 0.24 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Leysen F.
Defender
|
- | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/7(86%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Van De Perre K.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 |
|
Ferri N.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.17 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Sayyad A.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.46 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Alcocer J.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.09 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Bayram E.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Fuseini M.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Haspolat D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.09 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Keita S.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Khalaili A.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.08 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Piedfort A.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Zorgane A.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Burgess C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chambaere V.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Giger M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jungdal A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Leysen F.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mac Allister K.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Neustadter R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Nsiala-Makengo C.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ourega D.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Patris L.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Reynolds B.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sakamoto I.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Schoofs R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Smith G.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sykes R.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Van Den Keybus T.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Zeneli B.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sayyad A.
Forward
|
7 | 19/31(61%) | - | 1 | - | 0.03 | 10/19(53%) | 47 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Khalaili A.
Forward
|
5 | 30/42(71%) | - | - | - | 0.27 | 10/19(53%) | 73 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Bayram E.
Defender
|
3 | 29/38(76%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 1/5(20%) | 52 | 2/6(33%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Ferri N.
Forward
|
3 | 10/22(45%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/13(31%) | 43 | - | 1/1(100%) | 1/3(33%) | 3 | 1 |
|
Alcocer J.
Forward
|
2 | 15/22(68%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 2/4(50%) | 54 | - | 1/2(50%) | 3/8(38%) | 2 | - |
|
Fuseini M.
Forward
|
2 | 8/11(73%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/8(75%) | 20 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | 3 |
|
Van De Perre K.
Midfielder
|
2 | 42/47(89%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/8(75%) | 67 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Giger M.
Forward
|
1 | 24/26(92%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/5(80%) | 42 | - | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Keita S.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Patris L.
Defender
|
1 | 16/18(89%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 5/6(83%) | 28 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Schoofs R.
Midfielder
|
1 | 26/33(79%) | - | - | - | 0.2 | 9/11(82%) | 48 | 1/2(50%) | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - |
|
Zorgane A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 60/76(79%) | - | - | - | 0.11 | 16/28(57%) | 89 | 6/9(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Burgess C.
Defender
|
- | 80/90(89%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 6/10(60%) | 104 | 10/15(67%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Chambaere V.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 18/21(86%) | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | 6/9(67%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Haspolat D.
Midfielder
|
- | 23/31(74%) | - | - | - | 0.23 | 8/15(53%) | 53 | 1/5(20%) | 2/6(33%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Jungdal A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 22/43(51%) | - | - | - | - | 3/16(19%) | 47 | 11/32(34%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Leysen F.
Defender
|
- | 6/7(86%) | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Mac Allister K.
Defender
|
- | 57/66(86%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 9/13(69%) | 89 | 1/5(20%) | - | - | 1 | 2 |
|
Neustadter R.
Midfielder
|
- | 37/38(97%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/5(100%) | 42 | 5/5(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Nsiala-Makengo C.
Defender
|
- | 15/18(83%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 25 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Ourega D.
Forward
|
- | 6/7(86%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 16 | 1/2(50%) | - | 2/3(67%) | - | - |
|
Piedfort A.
Defender
|
- | 23/28(82%) | 1 | - | - | 0.07 | 9/10(90%) | 53 | 2/3(67%) | 1/1(100%) | 3/5(60%) | 5 | - |
|
Reynolds B.
Defender
|
- | 25/34(74%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 8/13(62%) | 58 | 2/5(40%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Sakamoto I.
Forward
|
- | 8/9(89%) | - | - | - | - | 3/3(100%) | 22 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Smith G.
Forward
|
- | 4/7(57%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 13 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sykes R.
Defender
|
- | 52/55(95%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 8/9(89%) | 68 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Van Den Keybus T.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/5(80%) | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Zeneli B.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/8(63%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 14 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ferri N.
Forward
|
24 | 10/17(59%) | 3/7(43%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Alcocer J.
Forward
|
19 | - | 11/18(61%) | - | 4/6(67%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Giger M.
Forward
|
19 | 3/4(75%) | 5/15(33%) | 3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Piedfort A.
Defender
|
18 | 1/4(25%) | 12/14(86%) | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Burgess C.
Defender
|
16 | 4/11(36%) | 3/5(60%) | 3 | 1/2(50%) | - | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Van De Perre K.
Midfielder
|
16 | - | 5/14(36%) | 4 | 2/4(50%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Khalaili A.
Forward
|
14 | 3/3(100%) | 5/11(45%) | - | 2/4(50%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Mac Allister K.
Defender
|
14 | 4/5(80%) | 7/9(78%) | 1 | 3/6(50%) | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Sayyad A.
Forward
|
11 | 1/4(25%) | 3/7(43%) | 2 | 1/3(33%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Zorgane A.
Midfielder
|
11 | 2/3(67%) | 4/8(50%) | 1 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Haspolat D.
Midfielder
|
9 | - | 6/9(67%) | 1 | 3/4(75%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Nsiala-Makengo C.
Defender
|
9 | 1/4(25%) | 2/5(40%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sakamoto I.
Forward
|
9 | - | 3/9(33%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sykes R.
Defender
|
8 | 3/5(60%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - | 3 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Bayram E.
Defender
|
5 | 1/2(50%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Reynolds B.
Defender
|
5 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Zeneli B.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Fuseini M.
Forward
|
4 | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ourega D.
Forward
|
4 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Schoofs R.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Leysen F.
Defender
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Smith G.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jungdal A.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Neustadter R.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Patris L.
Defender
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Van Den Keybus T.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chambaere V.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Keita S.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chambaere V.
Goalkeeper
|
0.81 | 4 | 0.81 | - | - | 3 | 1 |
|
Jungdal A.
Goalkeeper
|
0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | - | - | 1 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the Pro League tournament, the teams K.V.C. Westerlo and Royale Union Saint-Gilloise will play a football match at the home stadium of the team K.V.C. Westerlo - Het Kuipje. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Belgium, 01 Mar 2026 at 10:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team K.V.C. Westerlo. Team line-up:
- Goalkeeper: Jungdal Andreas
- Left back: Nsiala-Makengo Clinton
- Central defender: Neustadter Roman
- Central defender: Bayram Emin
- Right back: Reynolds Bryan
- Central midfielder: Haspolat Dogucan
- Central midfielder: Piedfort Arthur
- Left winger: Alcocer Josimar
- Central midfielder: Sakamoto Isa
- Right winger: Sayyad Allahyar
- Striker: Ferri Nacho
- Goalkeeper: Chambaere Vic
- Central defender: Mac Allister Kevin
- Central defender: Burgess Christian
- Central defender: Sykes Ross
- Right winger: Khalaili Anan
- Central midfielder: Zorgane Adem
- Central midfielder: Van De Perre Kamiel
- Left winger: Patris Louis
- Striker: Schoofs Rob
- Striker: Giger Marc Philipp
- Striker: Fuseini Mohammed
K.V.C. Westerlo vs. Royale Union Saint-Gilloise match info: Tournament - Pro League. Match start date - 01 Mar 2026. Match start time - 10:00.
