More
Pardubice - Slavia Prague 01.02.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
1
Statistics
2.14
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.92
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
4
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Pardubice
Slavia Prague
![Slavia Prague]()
0 wins
3 draws
11 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Pardubice
Slavia Prague
![Slavia Prague]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Match facts
The most common result of matches between FK Pardubice and Slavia Prague is 0-2. 3 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 7 meetings with FK Pardubice playing at home, FK Pardubice have won 1 times, there have been 1 draws while Slavia Prague have won 5 times. The goal difference is 13-6 in favour of Slavia Prague.
During the last 14 meetings, FK Pardubice have won 1 times, there have been 2 draws while Slavia Prague have won 11 times. The goal difference is 36-8 in favour of Slavia Prague.
FK Pardubice's last home win against Slavia Prague was in 2013.
Last season Slavia Prague won both games against FK Pardubice (2-0 at home and 2-0 away).
Show more
Pardubice
DRAW
Slavia Prague
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Pardubice
No goal
34%
Slavia Prague
Predictions
The upcoming Czech Republic 1. Liga tournament includes a match between Pardubice and Slavia Prague which will take place on 01.02 at 12:30. Sports bettors can find handy tips for this match by using the statistical analysis and predictions of the teams.
2 / 10 of her last matches Pardubice in all competitions ended in defeat
3 / 10 of last matches Pardubice in 1. Liga ended in defeat
4 / 10 of last matches Slavia Prague in all tournaments ended with her victory
7 / 10 of last matches Slavia Prague in 1. Liga ended with her victory
9 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Slavia Prague
6 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Pardubice did not draw
Standings
1. Liga 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Slavia Prague
|
30 | 71 | 21 | 8 | 1 | 63:23 |
| 2 |
AC Sparta Prague
|
30 | 63 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 60:33 |
| 3 |
Viktoria Plzen
|
30 | 53 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 50:34 |
| 7 |
Sigma Olomouc
|
30 | 43 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 34:34 |
| 8 |
Pardubice
|
30 | 41 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 39:46 |
| 9 |
Karvina
|
30 | 39 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 43:51 |
Hradec Kralove
Slovan Liberec
Zlin
1. Liga 25/26, Championship Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Slavia Prague
|
35 | 80 | 24 | 8 | 3 | 74:31 |
| 2 |
AC Sparta Prague
|
35 | 76 | 23 | 7 | 5 | 69:34 |
| 3 |
Viktoria Plzen
|
35 | 63 | 18 | 9 | 8 | 60:38 |
Other matches of round
Match info
12:30
Sunday 01 February 2026
Czech Republic, Pardubice,
CFIG Arena
Referee
Nehasil Lukas
Czech Republic
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Starting
Pardubice
Substitutes
Manager
-
Trousil J.
-
Trpisovsky J.
Pardubice
Slavia Prague
![Slavia Prague]()
Main Stats
2.14
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.92
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.91
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
2.61
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
2.12
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.03
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
4
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
2.61
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.91
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.61
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.91
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Pardubice
Slavia Prague
![Slavia Prague]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provod L.
Midfielder
|
8.4 | 90 | 1 | 0.81 | - | 0.34 | 4 | 27/33(82%) | 1 | - |
Jurasek D.
Defender
|
7.6 | 89 | - | - | 1 | 0.49 | - | 9/16(56%) | - | - |
Simek S.
Midfielder
|
7.6 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.2 | 2 | 45/51(88%) | - | - |
|
Mahuta R.
Defender
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.39 | - | 36/38(95%) | - | - |
|
Mandous A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 17/20(85%) | - | - |
Sadilek M.
Midfielder
|
7.5 | 90 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 16/21(76%) | - | - |
Stanek J.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 18/34(53%) | - | - |
|
Tanko A.
Forward
|
7.5 | 45 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.6 | 1 | 10/11(91%) | - | - |
|
Vecheta F.
Forward
|
7.5 | 45 | 1 | 0.12 | - | - | 4 | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
Bammens S.
Defender
|
7.4 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 56/62(90%) | - | - |
|
Brian Noslin J.
Defender
|
7.4 | 90 | - | 0.15 | - | 0.19 | 2 | 47/51(92%) | - | - |
|
Solil T.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 66 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.09 | 1 | 24/29(83%) | - | - |
Boril J.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 13/17(76%) | - | - |
Zima D.
Defender
|
7.1 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | - | 1 | 10/11(91%) | - | - |
Chaloupek S.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | 0.15 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 14/19(74%) | - | - |
Chytil M.
Forward
|
6.9 | 80 | - | 0.21 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 12/15(80%) | - | - |
Doudera D.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.16 | - | 15/20(75%) | - | - |
Chory T.
Forward
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.7 | - | 0.09 | 4 | 22/33(67%) | - | - |
|
Saarma R.
Midfielder
|
6.3 | 59 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 12/15(80%) | - | - |
|
Samuel V.
Forward
|
6.3 | 32 | - | 0.2 | - | - | 1 | 4/4(100%) | - | - |
|
Smekal D.
Forward
|
6.3 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Hlavaty M.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.29 | - | 0.13 | 3 | 37/46(80%) | - | - |
|
Hamza J.
Defender
|
6.1 | 24 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 14/15(93%) | - | - |
|
Botos G.
Midfielder
|
5.6 | 58 | - | 1.18 | - | 0.1 | 2 | 10/19(53%) | - | - |
Dorley O.
Midfielder
|
3.9 | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | - | 1 |
Mbodji Y.
Defender
|
- | 1 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chory T.
Forward
|
4 | 1 | 0.43 | 1 | 2 | - | 4 | - |
|
Provod L.
Midfielder
|
4 | 4 | 1.94 | - | - | - | 2 | 2 |
|
Vecheta F.
Forward
|
4 | 1 | 0.32 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
|
Hlavaty M.
Midfielder
|
3 | 1 | 0.26 | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Botos G.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.73 | 1 | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Brian Noslin J.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Chaloupek S.
Defender
|
2 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Chytil M.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Simek S.
Midfielder
|
2 | 2 | 0.46 | - | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Saarma R.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Sadilek M.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Samuel V.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Solil T.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.03 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Tanko A.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Zima D.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Bammens S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Boril J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Dorley O.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Doudera D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hamza J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jurasek D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mahuta R.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mandous A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mbodji Y.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Smekal D.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Stanek J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chory T.
Forward
|
10 | 22/33(67%) | - | 1 | - | 0.09 | 12/19(63%) | 54 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 3 | 1 |
|
Provod L.
Midfielder
|
5 | 27/33(82%) | - | - | - | 0.34 | 13/16(81%) | 59 | 2/2(100%) | 3/6(50%) | 3/5(60%) | - | - |
|
Vecheta F.
Forward
|
5 | 4/6(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Chytil M.
Forward
|
4 | 12/15(80%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 8/11(73%) | 27 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Saarma R.
Midfielder
|
4 | 12/15(80%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 3/5(60%) | 23 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Botos G.
Midfielder
|
3 | 10/19(53%) | - | 2 | - | 0.1 | 6/10(60%) | 28 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Chaloupek S.
Defender
|
3 | 14/19(74%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/7(57%) | 35 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Hlavaty M.
Midfielder
|
3 | 37/46(80%) | - | - | - | 0.13 | 10/14(71%) | 58 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Jurasek D.
Defender
|
3 | 9/16(56%) | 2 | - | 1 | 0.49 | 3/8(38%) | 36 | 1/3(33%) | 1/1(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 2 | - |
|
Samuel V.
Forward
|
3 | 4/4(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | 14 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Solil T.
Midfielder
|
3 | 24/29(83%) | - | - | - | 0.09 | 7/9(78%) | 43 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Mahuta R.
Defender
|
2 | 36/38(95%) | - | - | 1 | 0.39 | 14/16(88%) | 62 | 1/1(100%) | 2/6(33%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - |
|
Sadilek M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 16/21(76%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 5/8(63%) | 53 | 1/3(33%) | 2/7(29%) | - | 5 | - |
|
Zima D.
Defender
|
2 | 10/11(91%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 23 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Bammens S.
Defender
|
1 | 56/62(90%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 9/13(69%) | 83 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Brian Noslin J.
Defender
|
1 | 47/51(92%) | - | - | - | 0.19 | 15/17(88%) | 74 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Hamza J.
Defender
|
1 | 14/15(93%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/4(75%) | 19 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tanko A.
Forward
|
1 | 10/11(91%) | 1 | - | - | 0.6 | 4/5(80%) | 19 | - | 1/1(100%) | 3/3(100%) | - | - |
|
Boril J.
Defender
|
- | 13/17(76%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 5/6(83%) | 35 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Dorley O.
Midfielder
|
- | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | 3/4(75%) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Doudera D.
Defender
|
- | 15/20(75%) | - | - | - | 0.16 | 6/9(67%) | 45 | 2/5(40%) | 1/3(33%) | 1/3(33%) | 2 | - |
|
Mandous A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 17/20(85%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 27 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Mbodji Y.
Defender
|
- | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/4(50%) | 6 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Simek S.
Midfielder
|
- | 45/51(88%) | - | - | - | 0.2 | 22/22(100%) | 77 | 6/8(75%) | 1/6(17%) | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - |
|
Smekal D.
Forward
|
- | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Stanek J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 18/34(53%) | - | - | - | - | 5/7(71%) | 49 | 16/32(50%) | - | - | 2 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chory T.
Forward
|
16 | 6/9(67%) | 4/7(57%) | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Sadilek M.
Midfielder
|
14 | - | 10/14(71%) | - | 1/5(20%) | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Bammens S.
Defender
|
13 | 4/8(50%) | 2/5(40%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | - | 12 | - | - | - |
|
Provod L.
Midfielder
|
13 | 2/3(67%) | 5/10(50%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Jurasek D.
Defender
|
10 | 1/1(100%) | 7/9(78%) | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Mahuta R.
Defender
|
10 | - | 4/9(44%) | 3 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Simek S.
Midfielder
|
10 | 1/2(50%) | 6/8(75%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Brian Noslin J.
Defender
|
9 | 2/3(67%) | 3/6(50%) | 2 | - | 1 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Chytil M.
Forward
|
9 | 2/6(33%) | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Doudera D.
Defender
|
9 | - | 5/9(56%) | 2 | 1/2(50%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Chaloupek S.
Defender
|
8 | 3/6(50%) | 2/2(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 4 | 3 | - | 1 | - |
|
Botos G.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 3/5(60%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Solil T.
Midfielder
|
7 | 1/2(50%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Vecheta F.
Forward
|
7 | 3/4(75%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hlavaty M.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 1/4(25%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tanko A.
Forward
|
6 | - | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Zima D.
Defender
|
5 | 2/2(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 2 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Boril J.
Defender
|
4 | 1/2(50%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Dorley O.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/4(25%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Samuel V.
Forward
|
4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mbodji Y.
Defender
|
3 | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Saarma R.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 1/1(50%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Smekal D.
Forward
|
3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Stanek J.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Hamza J.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mandous A.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mandous A.
Goalkeeper
|
1.78 | 5 | 2.78 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Stanek J.
Goalkeeper
|
0.79 | 5 | 1.79 | 1 | 1 | 3 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the 1. Liga tournament, the teams Pardubice and Slavia Prague will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Pardubice - CFIG Arena. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Czech Republic, 01 Feb 2026 at 12:30. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Pardubice. Team line-up:
- : Mandous Ales
- : Krobot Ladislav
- : Hlavaty Michal
- : Solil Tomas
- : Mahuta Ryan
- : Simek Samuel
- : Tanko Abdoullahi
- : Brian Noslin Jason Jonathan
- : Bammens Simon
- : Saarma Robi
- : Botos Giannis-Fivos
- : Stanek Jindrich
- : Chaloupek Stepan
- : Zima David
- : Boril Jan
- : Doudera David
- : Sadilek Michal
- : Dorley Oscar
- : Chytil Mojmir
- : Chory Tomas
- : Provod Lukas
- : Jurasek David
Pardubice vs. Slavia Prague match info: Tournament - 1. Liga. Match start date - 01 Feb 2026. Match start time - 12:30.
