More
Kerala Blasters - Punjab FC 21.03.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
3
1st HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
0.37
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.3
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Kerala Blasters
Punjab FC
![Punjab FC]()
3 wins
1 draws
3 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Kerala Blasters
Punjab FC
![Punjab FC]()
Statistics from 2026 season of Indian Super League
Match facts
During the last 6 meetings, Kerala Blasters FC have won 3 times, there have been 1 draws while Punjab FC have won 2 times. The goal difference is 8-7 in favour of Kerala Blasters FC.
Kerala Blasters FC haven't won in their last 6 games.
Kerala Blasters FC have a losing streak of 3 matches at home.
Kerala Blasters FC haven't scored in 2 of their 3 home matches in Indian Super League this season.
Kerala Blasters FC's home record this season: 0-0-3.
Show more
Kerala Blasters
DRAW
Punjab FC
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Kerala Blasters
No goal
34%
Punjab FC
Predictions
The upcoming India Indian Super League tournament includes a match between Kerala Blasters and Punjab FC which will take place on 21.03 at 10:00. Sports bettors can find handy tips for this match by using the statistical analysis and predictions of the teams.
6 / 10 of her last matches Kerala Blasters in all competitions ended in defeat
4 / 5 of last matches Kerala Blasters in Indian Super League ended in defeat
3 / 10 of last matches Punjab FC in all tournaments ended with her victory
1 / 4 of last matches Punjab FC in Indian Super League ended with her victory
2 / 6 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Punjab FC
6 / 10 of her last matches Kerala Blasters in all competitions ended in defeat
Standings
Super League 2026
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 |
Jamshedpur
|
13 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 15:10 |
| 6 |
Punjab FC
|
13 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 18:12 |
| 7 |
Goa
|
13 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 15:11 |
| 8 |
Kerala Blasters
|
13 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 15:17 |
| 9 |
North East United
|
13 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 16:21 |
East Bengal
Bengaluru
Mohammedan Kolkata
Other matches of round
Match info
10:00
Saturday 21 March 2026
India, Kochi,
Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Kerala Blasters
5-4-1
Punjab FC
4-2-3-1
Starting
Kerala Blasters
Substitutes
Manager
-
Catala D.
-
Dilberis P.
Kerala Blasters
Punjab FC
![Punjab FC]()
Main Stats
0.37
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.3
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
0.34
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
2.91
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.43
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.68
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
2.91
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.34
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.09
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-0.66
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Kerala Blasters
Punjab FC
![Punjab FC]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 2026 season of Indian Super League
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zeljkovic S.
Defender
|
8.5 | 90 | 1 | 0.36 | 1 | 0.2 | 5 | 18/21(86%) | - | - |
|
Osuji B.
Forward
|
8.1 | 90 | 1 | 0.35 | - | 0.03 | 3 | 14/23(61%) | - | - |
|
Ramirez Fernandez D.
Midfielder
|
7.7 | 45 | 1 | 0.37 | - | 0.02 | 2 | 10/14(71%) | - | - |
|
Shabong R.
Midfielder
|
7.4 | 90 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.12 | 1 | 23/32(72%) | - | - |
|
Kipgen M.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 83 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 22/30(73%) | - | - |
|
V B.
Defender
|
7 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | - | 1 | 19/22(86%) | 1 | - |
|
Singh A.
Goalkeeper
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 12/24(50%) | - | - |
|
Asokan L.
Forward
|
6.8 | 45 | - | - | - | - | - | 5/8(63%) | - | - |
|
Quitongo J.
Forward
|
6.8 | 58 | - | 0.11 | 1 | 0.13 | 1 | 3/5(60%) | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 30 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 4/7(57%) | - | - |
|
Meitei N.
Defender
|
6.7 | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/5(80%) | - | - |
|
Yoke K.
Forward
|
6.6 | 90 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.06 | 2 | 28/34(82%) | - | - |
|
Dohling A.
Defender
|
6.6 | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | 12/13(92%) | - | - |
Singh S.
Defender
|
6.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 23/38(61%) | 1 | - |
|
Uvais Moyikka M.
Defender
|
6.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.2 | - | 16/20(80%) | - | - |
|
Mohanan V.
Midfielder
|
6.5 | 32 | - | - | - | - | - | 13/15(87%) | - | - |
|
Ndiaye F.
Defender
|
6.5 | 90 | 1 | 0.07 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 36/46(78%) | - | - |
|
Lhungdim K.
Midfielder
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.05 | 1 | - | 1 | 19/27(70%) | - | - |
|
Ajsal M.
Forward
|
6.3 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/8(50%) | - | - |
|
Farooq D.
Midfielder
|
6.3 | 57 | - | - | - | - | - | 21/27(78%) | - | - |
|
Singh H.
Defender
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.04 | 3 | 22/32(69%) | 1 | - |
|
Hormipam R.
Defender
|
6.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 75/86(87%) | 1 | - |
|
Shaikh A.
Goalkeeper
|
6 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 34/35(97%) | 1 | - |
|
Suhail F M.
Forward
|
6 | 60 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 5/6(83%) | - | - |
|
Sudeesh N.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 33 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 6/6(100%) | - | - |
|
Yesudasan E.
Midfielder
|
5.7 | 82 | - | - | - | 0.06 | - | 37/47(79%) | - | - |
|
Lallawmawma F.
Midfielder
|
- | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | 8/13(62%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Zeljkovic S.
Defender
|
5 | 3 | 1.41 | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | 3 |
|
Osuji B.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 0.99 | 1 | - | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Singh H.
Defender
|
3 | 1 | 0.05 | 2 | - | - | - | 3 |
|
Kipgen M.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Ramirez Fernandez D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.52 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Yoke K.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Lhungdim K.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Ndiaye F.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.24 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Quitongo J.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.05 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Shabong R.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Sudeesh N.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Suhail F M.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
V B.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Ajsal M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Asokan L.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Dohling A.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Farooq D.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hormipam R.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lallawmawma F.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Meitei N.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Mohanan V.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Shaikh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Uvais Moyikka M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Yesudasan E.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Osuji B.
Forward
|
7 | 14/23(61%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 8/10(80%) | 40 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Ndiaye F.
Defender
|
5 | 36/46(78%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/5(40%) | 55 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Quitongo J.
Forward
|
4 | 3/5(60%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.13 | 1/3(33%) | 16 | - | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 |
|
Lhungdim K.
Midfielder
|
3 | 19/27(70%) | - | - | 1 | - | 3/6(50%) | 45 | 1/5(20%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 3 | - |
|
Yoke K.
Forward
|
3 | 28/34(82%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 9/12(75%) | 59 | 1/1(100%) | - | 5/8(63%) | 1 | - |
|
Zeljkovic S.
Defender
|
3 | 18/21(86%) | - | - | 1 | 0.2 | 10/11(91%) | 38 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Yesudasan E.
Midfielder
|
2 | 37/47(79%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 6/13(46%) | 60 | 1/5(20%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Ajsal M.
Forward
|
1 | 4/8(50%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 18 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Ramirez Fernandez D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 10/14(71%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 7/9(78%) | 23 | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Shabong R.
Midfielder
|
1 | 23/32(72%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 4/4(100%) | 60 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | 4 | - |
|
Singh H.
Defender
|
1 | 22/32(69%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 5/10(50%) | 68 | 1/3(33%) | 1/3(33%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Suhail F M.
Forward
|
1 | 5/6(83%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 4/4(100%) | 20 | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 3 | 1 |
|
Uvais Moyikka M.
Defender
|
1 | 16/20(80%) | - | - | - | 0.2 | 3/4(75%) | 42 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
V B.
Defender
|
1 | 19/22(86%) | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Asokan L.
Forward
|
- | 5/8(63%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 17 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Dohling A.
Defender
|
- | 12/13(92%) | - | - | - | - | 3/3(100%) | 19 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Farooq D.
Midfielder
|
- | 21/27(78%) | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Hormipam R.
Defender
|
- | 75/86(87%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/10(60%) | 100 | 6/11(55%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Kipgen M.
Midfielder
|
- | 22/30(73%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/11(55%) | 44 | - | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - |
|
Lallawmawma F.
Midfielder
|
- | 8/13(62%) | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Meitei N.
Defender
|
- | 4/5(80%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 11 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Mohanan V.
Midfielder
|
- | 13/15(87%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 16 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Shaikh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 34/35(97%) | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 12/24(50%) | - | - | - | - | 1/6(17%) | 31 | 8/20(40%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/7(57%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/5(40%) | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Defender
|
- | 23/38(61%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/15(40%) | 66 | 1/10(10%) | 1/4(25%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - |
|
Sudeesh N.
Midfielder
|
- | 6/6(100%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/1(100%) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yoke K.
Forward
|
17 | 3/5(60%) | 6/12(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Lhungdim K.
Midfielder
|
14 | 2/4(50%) | 5/10(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Shabong R.
Midfielder
|
14 | - | 9/13(69%) | 1 | 4/5(80%) | 5 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Osuji B.
Forward
|
13 | 3/6(50%) | 2/7(29%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Defender
|
13 | 2/3(67%) | 4/10(40%) | 4 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
V B.
Defender
|
11 | 1/5(20%) | 3/6(50%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 3 | 15 | - | - | - |
|
Hormipam R.
Defender
|
10 | 1/3(33%) | 4/7(57%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 3 | 3 | 1 | - | - |
|
Ndiaye F.
Defender
|
9 | 6/6(100%) | - | 2 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Quitongo J.
Forward
|
8 | - | 1/7(14%) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Suhail F M.
Forward
|
8 | - | 5/8(63%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ajsal M.
Forward
|
7 | 1/2(50%) | 4/5(80%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh H.
Defender
|
6 | - | 2/4(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Zeljkovic S.
Defender
|
6 | - | 3/6(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Farooq D.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Uvais Moyikka M.
Defender
|
5 | 1/3(33%) | 2/2(100%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Singh S.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1/1(100%) | 1/3(33%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kipgen M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ramirez Fernandez D.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Asokan L.
Forward
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Dohling A.
Defender
|
2 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Lallawmawma F.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Yesudasan E.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Meitei N.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Mohanan V.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sudeesh N.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Shaikh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Singh A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shaikh A.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.09 | 3 | 2.91 | 3 | - | 10 | - |
|
Singh A.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.66 | 2 | 0.34 | 1 | 1 | 3 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the Indian Super League tournament, the teams Kerala Blasters and Punjab FC will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Kerala Blasters - Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in India, 21 Mar 2026 at 10:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Kerala Blasters. Team line-up:
- Right back: Singh Soraisham Sandeep
- Central defender: Hormipam Ruivah
- Central midfielder: Mohanan Vibin
- Right winger: Farooq Danish
- Striker: Ajsal Muhammad
- Central defender: Dohling Aibanbha Kupar
- Goalkeeper: Shaikh Arsh Anwer
- Left winger: Yoke Kevin
- Central defender: Ndiaye Fallou
- Central midfielder: Yesudasan Ebindas
- Left back: Singh Huidrom Naocha
- Left back: Uvais Moyikka Muhammed
- Central defender: V Bijoy
- Central midfielder: Shabong Ricky John
- Central midfielder: Zeljkovic Samir
- Central midfielder: Ramirez Fernandez Daniel
- Right back: Lhungdim Khaiminthang
- Goalkeeper: Singh Arshdeep
- Striker: Suhail F Muhammad
- Right winger: Kipgen Manglenthang
- Central defender: Singh Pramveer
- Left winger: Osuji Bede Amarachi
Kerala Blasters vs. Punjab FC match info: Tournament - Indian Super League. Match start date - 21 Mar 2026. Match start time - 10:00.
