More
Jablonec - Banik Ostrava 11.04.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
2
:
1
1st HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
3.19
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.84
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
5
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Jablonec
Banik Ostrava
![Banik Ostrava]()
8 wins
2 draws
5 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Jablonec
Banik Ostrava
![Banik Ostrava]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Match facts
The most common result of matches between FK Jablonec and FC Banik Ostrava when FK Jablonec is playing at home is 1-1. 8 matches have ended with this result.
The most common result of matches between FK Jablonec and FC Banik Ostrava is 1-1. 9 matches have ended with this result.
During the last 26 meetings with FK Jablonec playing at home, FK Jablonec have won 13 times, there have been 10 draws while FC Banik Ostrava have won 3 times. The goal difference is 47-23 in favour of FK Jablonec.
During the last 51 meetings, FK Jablonec have won 22 times, there have been 15 draws while FC Banik Ostrava have won 14 times. The goal difference is 74-56 in favour of FK Jablonec.
Last season's matches: 3-1 (FK Jablonec at home) and 1-0 (FC Banik Ostrava at home).
Show more
Jablonec
DRAW
Banik Ostrava
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Jablonec
No goal
34%
Banik Ostrava
Predictions
The Jablonec vs Banik Ostrava match in the Czech Republic 1. Liga is set to begin on 11.04 at 09:00. For those interested in sports betting, they can use in-depth Jablonec Banik Ostrava betting tips by analyzing the statistics and making a prediction for the match.
5 / 10 of last matches Jablonec in all tournaments ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches Jablonec in 1. Liga ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Jablonec
4 / 10 of her last matches Banik Ostrava in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Banik Ostrava in 1. Liga ended in defeat
8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Jablonec did not draw
Standings
1. Liga 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 |
Viktoria Plzen
|
30 | 53 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 50:34 |
| 4 |
Jablonec
|
30 | 51 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 41:33 |
| 5 |
Hradec Kralove
|
30 | 49 | 14 | 7 | 9 | 43:34 |
| 14 |
Dukla Prague
|
30 | 23 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 20:42 |
| 15 |
1. Slovacko
|
30 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 26:45 |
| 16 |
Banik Ostrava
|
30 | 22 | 5 | 7 | 18 | 25:45 |
Teplice
Karvina
1. Liga 25/26, Championship Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
Hradec Kralove
|
35 | 56 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 50:41 |
| 5 |
Jablonec
|
35 | 55 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 45:47 |
| 6 |
Slovan Liberec
|
35 | 46 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 45:39 |
1. Liga 25/26, Relegation Round
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
1. Slovacko
|
35 | 30 | 7 | 9 | 19 | 30:51 |
| 5 |
Banik Ostrava
|
35 | 29 | 7 | 8 | 20 | 32:49 |
| 6 |
Dukla Prague
|
35 | 26 | 5 | 11 | 19 | 23:51 |
Mlada Boleslav
Other matches of round
Match info
09:00
Saturday 11 April 2026
Czech Republic, Jablonec,
Stadion Strelnice
Referee
Benes Jan
Czech Republic
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Starting
Jablonec
Substitutes
Manager
-
Kozel L.
-
Smetana O.
Jablonec
Banik Ostrava
![Banik Ostrava]()
Main Stats
3.19
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.84
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
4.03
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.53
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
1.28
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.56
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
5
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
0.53
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
4.03
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.47
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.03
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Jablonec
Banik Ostrava
![Banik Ostrava]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of 1. Liga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singhateh E.
Forward
|
8 | 88 | 1 | 1.34 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 8/9(89%) | - | - |
|
Holly D.
Midfielder
|
7.7 | 39 | 1 | 0.9 | - | - | 2 | 2/5(40%) | - | - |
Chanturishvili V.
Midfielder
|
7.4 | 80 | - | 0.02 | 1 | 0.09 | 1 | 9/17(53%) | - | - |
|
Okeke N.
Midfielder
|
7.4 | 51 | 1 | 0.13 | - | - | 2 | 13/16(81%) | 1 | - |
|
Planka D.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.2 | - | 30/36(83%) | 1 | - |
|
Jawo L.
Forward
|
7.2 | 80 | - | - | 1 | 0.51 | - | 4/11(36%) | - | - |
|
Cedidla M.
Defender
|
7.1 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 28/38(74%) | - | - |
|
Pojezny K.
Defender
|
7.1 | 90 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 48/56(86%) | - | - |
|
Kricfalusi O.
Defender
|
7 | 90 | 1 | 0.35 | - | 0.02 | 2 | 38/48(79%) | - | - |
Hanus J.
Goalkeeper
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 20/30(67%) | - | - |
|
Rusnak M.
Defender
|
6.9 | 18 | - | 0.17 | - | - | 2 | 2/3(67%) | - | - |
|
Tekijaski N.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 28/37(76%) | - | - |
|
Zorvan F.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 80 | - | 0.25 | - | 0.07 | 1 | 24/35(69%) | - | - |
|
Boula J.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 18 | - | 0.17 | - | - | 1 | 6/8(75%) | - | - |
|
Pantalon R.
Defender
|
6.7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/35(69%) | - | - |
Sobol E.
Defender
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 16/23(70%) | - | - |
|
Brahim B.
Midfielder
|
6.4 | 72 | - | 0.13 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 17/20(85%) | - | - |
|
Gning A.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 31 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/7(86%) | - | - |
|
Kohut M.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 72 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.16 | 1 | 25/32(78%) | - | - |
Sinyavskiy V.
Midfielder
|
5.9 | 82 | - | - | - | 0.05 | - | 11/19(58%) | - | - |
|
Chalus M.
Defender
|
5.9 | 82 | - | 0.05 | - | - | 1 | 13/20(65%) | 1 | - |
|
Pira J.
Forward
|
5.8 | 59 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 10/12(83%) | - | - |
Frydrych M.
Defender
|
5.5 | 90 | - | 0.03 | - | - | 1 | 43/52(83%) | - | - |
|
Jedlicka M.
Goalkeeper
|
5.4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 17/27(63%) | - | - |
|
Jurecka V.
Forward
|
5.2 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.06 | - | 18/22(82%) | 1 | - |
Chramosta J.
Forward
|
- | 2 | - | - | 1 | 0.28 | - | - | - | - |
|
Havran M.
Midfielder
|
- | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/5(40%) | - | - |
|
Musak A.
Midfielder
|
- | 8 | - | 0.06 | - | - | 1 | 3/3(100%) | - | - |
|
Puskac D.
Forward
|
- | 10 | - | - | 1 | 0.01 | - | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
|
Sedlacek R.
Midfielder
|
- | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/6(67%) | - | - |
|
Soucek D.
Defender
|
- | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Holly D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.99 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Kricfalusi O.
Defender
|
2 | 2 | 0.51 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Okeke N.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.62 | - | 1 | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Rusnak M.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Singhateh E.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.96 | 1 | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Boula J.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Chalus M.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Chanturishvili V.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Frydrych M.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Kohut M.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Musak A.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Pojezny K.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Sobol E.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Zorvan F.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.87 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Brahim B.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Cedidla M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chramosta J.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Gning A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hanus J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Havran M.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jawo L.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jedlicka M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jurecka V.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pantalon R.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pira J.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Planka D.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Puskac D.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sedlacek R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sinyavskiy V.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Soucek D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tekijaski N.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Singhateh E.
Forward
|
6 | 8/9(89%) | - | 1 | - | 0.01 | 4/5(80%) | 31 | - | - | 3/9(33%) | 1 | 3 |
|
Okeke N.
Midfielder
|
4 | 13/16(81%) | - | - | - | - | 2/5(40%) | 25 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Kohut M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 25/32(78%) | - | - | - | 0.16 | 4/8(50%) | 49 | - | 1/6(17%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Sinyavskiy V.
Midfielder
|
2 | 11/19(58%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 5/11(45%) | 45 | 1/2(50%) | 1/4(25%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Brahim B.
Midfielder
|
2 | 17/20(85%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 3/5(60%) | 47 | - | 1/4(25%) | - | 5 | - |
|
Boula J.
Midfielder
|
1 | 6/8(75%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 16 | - | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Cedidla M.
Defender
|
1 | 28/38(74%) | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | 52 | 3/6(50%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Chalus M.
Defender
|
1 | 13/20(65%) | - | - | - | - | 1/4(25%) | 33 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Chanturishvili V.
Midfielder
|
1 | 9/17(53%) | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | 4/8(50%) | 45 | - | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - |
|
Chramosta J.
Forward
|
1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 0.28 | - | 3 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Gning A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 6/7(86%) | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Holly D.
Midfielder
|
1 | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 14 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Jawo L.
Forward
|
1 | 4/11(36%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.51 | 1/6(17%) | 25 | 2/2(100%) | 1/4(25%) | - | 3 | 1 |
|
Kricfalusi O.
Defender
|
1 | 38/48(79%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 6/14(43%) | 60 | 2/6(33%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - |
|
Pira J.
Forward
|
1 | 10/12(83%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 4/6(67%) | 21 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rusnak M.
Defender
|
1 | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Sobol E.
Defender
|
1 | 16/23(70%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/8(75%) | 47 | 3/6(50%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Tekijaski N.
Defender
|
1 | 28/37(76%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 56 | 2/8(25%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Zorvan F.
Midfielder
|
1 | 24/35(69%) | - | 1 | - | 0.07 | 13/19(68%) | 49 | 2/7(29%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Frydrych M.
Defender
|
- | 43/52(83%) | - | - | - | - | - | 69 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Hanus J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 20/30(67%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 35 | 6/16(38%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Havran M.
Midfielder
|
- | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jedlicka M.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 17/27(63%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 30 | 2/12(17%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Jurecka V.
Forward
|
- | 18/22(82%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 6/9(67%) | 35 | - | - | 1/4(25%) | - | 2 |
|
Musak A.
Midfielder
|
- | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pantalon R.
Defender
|
- | 24/35(69%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 52 | 2/11(18%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Planka D.
Midfielder
|
- | 30/36(83%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.2 | 14/17(82%) | 51 | - | 1/6(17%) | - | 2 | 2 |
|
Pojezny K.
Defender
|
- | 48/56(86%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 10/14(71%) | 79 | 3/6(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Puskac D.
Forward
|
- | 4/6(67%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 9 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Sedlacek R.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/6(67%) | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Soucek D.
Defender
|
- | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Singhateh E.
Forward
|
12 | - | 5/11(45%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jurecka V.
Forward
|
11 | 1/3(33%) | 2/8(25%) | 3 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jawo L.
Forward
|
10 | 1/3(33%) | 4/7(57%) | 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Brahim B.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 7/10(70%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kricfalusi O.
Defender
|
9 | 2/4(50%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pira J.
Forward
|
9 | - | 2/6(33%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cedidla M.
Defender
|
8 | 3/4(75%) | 4/4(100%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | - | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Chalus M.
Defender
|
8 | 2/2(100%) | 2/6(33%) | 3 | - | 1 | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Sobol E.
Defender
|
8 | 1/1(100%) | 2/7(29%) | 5 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Tekijaski N.
Defender
|
8 | 2/2(100%) | 3/6(50%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 9 | - | - | - |
|
Pantalon R.
Defender
|
7 | - | 4/6(67%) | - | 3/4(75%) | 1 | 9 | - | - | - |
|
Boula J.
Midfielder
|
6 | 1/1(100%) | 5/5(100%) | - | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Okeke N.
Midfielder
|
6 | 2/3(67%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Pojezny K.
Defender
|
6 | 1/1(100%) | 2/5(40%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 4 | 8 | - | - | - |
|
Puskac D.
Forward
|
6 | 1/4(25%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chanturishvili V.
Midfielder
|
5 | 2/2(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Frydrych M.
Defender
|
5 | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Planka D.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rusnak M.
Defender
|
5 | - | 3/4(75%) | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Gning A.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Holly D.
Midfielder
|
4 | 2/2(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sinyavskiy V.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Kohut M.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | 1 | - | 2 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Zorvan F.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 3/3(100%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Havran M.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Soucek D.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Chramosta J.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Jedlicka M.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
|
Sedlacek R.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hanus J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Musak A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Jedlicka M.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.19 | 1 | 3.81 | 4 | - | 2 | - |
|
Hanus J.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.46 | 3 | 0.54 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the 1. Liga tournament, the teams Jablonec and Banik Ostrava will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Jablonec - Stadion Strelnice. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Czech Republic, 11 Apr 2026 at 09:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Jablonec. Team line-up:
- : Hanus Jan
- : Tekijaski Nemanja
- : Chanturishvili Vakhtang
- : Zorvan Filip
- : Holly Dominik
- : Cedidla Martin
- : Sobol Eduard
- : Nebyla Sebastian
- : Singhateh Ebrima
- : Jawo Lamin
- : Pantalon Renato
- : Jedlicka Martin
- : Chalus Matej
- : Frydrych Michal
- : Pojezny Karel
- : brahim Bewene Abdullahi
- : Kohut Michal
- : Kricfalusi Ondrej
- : Sinyavskiy Vlasiy
- : Jurecka Vaclav
- : Planka David
- : Pira Jakub
Jablonec vs. Banik Ostrava match info: Tournament - 1. Liga. Match start date - 11 Apr 2026. Match start time - 09:00.
