More
IMT Novi Beograd - Crvena Zvezda 15.03.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
1
:
2
1st HALF
Statistics
1.12
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.41
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
IMT Novi Beograd
Crvena Zvezda
![Crvena Zvezda]()
0 wins
7 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
IMT Novi Beograd
Crvena Zvezda
![Crvena Zvezda]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Superliga
Match facts
FK Crvena Zvezda Belgrade have previously won 4 of 6 matches against FK IMT Novi Beograd.
During the last 6 meetings, FK IMT Novi Beograd have won 0 times, there have been 0 draws while FK Crvena Zvezda Belgrade have won 6 times. The goal difference is 20-3 in favour of FK Crvena Zvezda Belgrade.
Last season FK Crvena Zvezda Belgrade won both games against FK IMT Novi Beograd (4-0 at home and 3-1 away).
FK Crvena Zvezda Belgrade have a winning streak of 7 matches in Superliga.
Did you know that FK IMT Novi Beograd scores 32% of their goals between the minutes 76-90? This is the highest percentage in the league.
Show more
IMT Novi Beograd
DRAW
Crvena Zvezda
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
IMT Novi Beograd
No goal
34%
Crvena Zvezda
Predictions
The upcoming Serbia Superliga tournament includes a match between IMT Novi Beograd and Crvena Zvezda which will take place on 15.03 at 12:00. Sports bettors can find handy tips for this match by using the statistical analysis and predictions of the teams.
5 / 10 of last matches in all competitions IMT Novi Beograd did not lose
6 / 10 of last matches in Superliga IMT Novi Beograd did not lose
5 / 10 of her last matches IMT Novi Beograd in all competitions ended in defeat
4 / 10 of last matches IMT Novi Beograd in Superliga ended in defeat
Standings
Superliga 25/26, Championship Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Crvena Zvezda
|
37 | 86 | 27 | 5 | 5 | 100:31 |
| 2 |
Vojvodina Novi Sad
|
37 | 76 | 23 | 7 | 7 | 66:35 |
| 3 |
Partizan Belgrade
|
37 | 73 | 22 | 7 | 8 | 72:45 |
OFK Beograd
Superliga 25/26, Relegation Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
IMT Novi Beograd
|
37 | 50 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 41:51 |
| 2 |
Radnicki Nis
|
37 | 49 | 14 | 7 | 16 | 46:49 |
| 3 |
Mladost Lucani
|
37 | 46 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 33:52 |
Javor Ivanjica
TSC Backa Topola
Superliga 25/26
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Crvena Zvezda
|
30 | 75 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 87:23 |
| 2 |
Vojvodina Novi Sad
|
30 | 62 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 55:29 |
| 3 |
Partizan Belgrade
|
30 | 61 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 62:39 |
| 8 |
Radnik Surdulica
|
30 | 39 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 37:35 |
| 9 |
IMT Novi Beograd
|
30 | 37 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 35:49 |
| 10 |
Radnicki 1923
|
30 | 36 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 32:37 |
Zeleznicar Pancevo
Other matches of round
Match info
12:00
Sunday 15 March 2026Referee
Lukic Lazar
Serbia
IMT Novi Beograd
Crvena Zvezda
![Crvena Zvezda]()
Main Stats
1.12
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.41
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.29
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.48
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.4
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.66
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
1.48
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.29
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.52
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.29
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
IMT Novi Beograd
Crvena Zvezda
![Crvena Zvezda]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Superliga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Katai A.
Forward
|
8.2 | 78 | 1 | 0.68 | - | 0.06 | 3 | 22/33(67%) | - | - |
Young-woo S.
Defender
|
8.1 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 65/67(97%) | - | - |
Arnautovic M.
Forward
|
7.7 | 78 | - | 0.17 | 1 | 0.52 | 1 | 11/14(79%) | - | - |
Kostov V.
Midfielder
|
7.6 | 87 | 1 | 0.36 | - | 0.12 | 3 | 35/39(90%) | - | - |
Avdic A.
Defender
|
7.3 | 68 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.19 | 1 | 21/26(81%) | - | - |
Krunic R.
Midfielder
|
7.2 | 90 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.1 | 1 | 65/73(89%) | - | - |
Matheus
Goalkeeper
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 29/37(78%) | - | - |
Elsnik T.
Midfielder
|
7.1 | 90 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.42 | 1 | 53/64(83%) | - | - |
Tiknizyan N.
Midfielder
|
7.1 | 22 | - | - | - | 0.05 | - | 10/12(83%) | - | - |
Veljkovic M.
Defender
|
6.9 | 90 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.05 | 1 | 65/69(94%) | - | - |
Zaric L.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 12 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 5/7(71%) | - | - |
Duarte B.
Forward
|
6.2 | 12 | - | - | - | 0.11 | - | 7/8(88%) | - | - |
Tiendrebeogo J.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 14/19(74%) | - | - |
Cancarevic O.
Goalkeeper
|
6 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 14/29(48%) | - | - |
Handel T.
Midfielder
|
- | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/8(75%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Katai A.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 1.11 | 1 | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Kostov V.
Midfielder
|
3 | 1 | 0.07 | 2 | - | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Tiendrebeogo J.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Zaric L.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | 0.05 | - | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
Arnautovic M.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Avdic A.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Elsnik T.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.06 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Krunic R.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Veljkovic M.
Defender
|
1 | 1 | 0.07 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Cancarevic O.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Duarte B.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Handel T.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Matheus
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tiknizyan N.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Young-woo S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Katai A.
Forward
|
8 | 22/33(67%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 12/20(60%) | 47 | 1/3(33%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 |
|
Kostov V.
Midfielder
|
6 | 35/39(90%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 13/16(81%) | 56 | 2/2(100%) | 3/4(75%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Elsnik T.
Midfielder
|
5 | 53/64(83%) | - | - | - | 0.42 | 14/19(74%) | 83 | 3/6(50%) | 2/6(33%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Arnautovic M.
Forward
|
3 | 11/14(79%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.52 | 7/7(100%) | 20 | - | - | - | 1 | 2 |
|
Krunic R.
Midfielder
|
3 | 65/73(89%) | - | - | - | 0.1 | 17/20(85%) | 90 | 1/3(33%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 2 | - |
|
Avdic A.
Defender
|
1 | 21/26(81%) | - | - | - | 0.19 | 9/13(69%) | 58 | 2/2(100%) | 2/4(50%) | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Duarte B.
Forward
|
1 | 7/8(88%) | - | - | - | 0.11 | 4/5(80%) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tiknizyan N.
Midfielder
|
1 | 10/12(83%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 3/5(60%) | 22 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Veljkovic M.
Defender
|
1 | 65/69(94%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | 9/13(69%) | 82 | 6/8(75%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Cancarevic O.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 14/29(48%) | - | - | - | - | - | 37 | 9/23(39%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Handel T.
Midfielder
|
- | 6/8(75%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 10 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Matheus
Goalkeeper
|
- | 29/37(78%) | - | - | - | - | - | 46 | 3/11(27%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Tiendrebeogo J.
Midfielder
|
- | 14/19(74%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/9(67%) | 32 | 3/7(43%) | 2/4(50%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Young-woo S.
Defender
|
- | 65/67(97%) | - | - | - | 0.02 | 12/14(86%) | 89 | 3/4(75%) | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Zaric L.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/7(71%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 11 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Avdic A.
Defender
|
15 | 3/4(75%) | 4/11(36%) | 1 | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Krunic R.
Midfielder
|
14 | 4/6(67%) | 5/8(63%) | - | - | 2 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Elsnik T.
Midfielder
|
11 | 4/4(100%) | 2/7(29%) | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Katai A.
Forward
|
8 | 4/5(80%) | 1/3(33%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Veljkovic M.
Defender
|
8 | 2/4(50%) | 2/4(50%) | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Kostov V.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 4/7(57%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Young-woo S.
Defender
|
7 | - | 4/6(67%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Tiendrebeogo J.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 3/6(50%) | 3 | 1/2(50%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Arnautovic M.
Forward
|
5 | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Handel T.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Duarte B.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tiknizyan N.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | 2/2(100%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Zaric L.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cancarevic O.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Matheus
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Matheus
Goalkeeper
|
0.29 | 2 | 1.29 | 1 | - | 5 | - |
|
Cancarevic O.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.64 | 4 | 1.36 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Serbia, 15 Mar 2026 at 12:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team IMT Novi Beograd. The football team Crvena Zvezda.
IMT Novi Beograd vs. Crvena Zvezda match info: Tournament - Superliga. Match start date - 15 Mar 2026. Match start time - 12:00.
