More
Thun - Grasshopper Club Zurich 14.03.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
2
:
1
1st HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
2.4
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.69
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
4
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Thun
Grasshopper Club Zurich
![Grasshopper Club Zurich]()
6 wins
5 draws
4 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Thun
Grasshopper Club Zurich
![Grasshopper Club Zurich]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Super League
Match facts
During the last 39 meetings with FC Thun playing at home, FC Thun have won 14 times, there have been 10 draws while Grasshopper Club Zurich have won 15 times. The goal difference is 55-51 in favour of Grasshopper Club Zurich.
During the last 75 meetings, FC Thun have won 27 times, there have been 19 draws while Grasshopper Club Zurich have won 29 times. The goal difference is 100-94 in favour of Grasshopper Club Zurich.
FC Thun's last home win against Grasshopper Club Zurich was in 2021.
Did you know that FC Thun scores 23% of their goals between the minutes 46-60? This is the highest percentage in the league.
Did you know that Grasshopper Club Zurich scores 24% of their goals between the minutes 76-90?
Show more
Thun
DRAW
Grasshopper Club Zurich
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Thun
No goal
34%
Grasshopper Club Zurich
Predictions
The Thun vs Grasshopper Club Zurich match in the Switzerland Super League is set to begin on 14.03 at 13:00. For those interested in sports betting, they can use in-depth Thun Grasshopper Club Zurich betting tips by analyzing the statistics and making a prediction for the match.
9 / 10 of last matches Thun in all tournaments ended with her victory
9 / 10 of last matches Thun in Super League ended with her victory
3 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Thun
4 / 10 of her last matches Grasshopper Club Zurich in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Grasshopper Club Zurich in Super League ended in defeat
9 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Thun did not draw
Standings
Alpe Adria Cup 18/19, Knockout Stage
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Thun
|
38 | 75 | 24 | 3 | 11 | 80:52 |
| 2 |
St. Gallen
|
38 | 70 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 72:47 |
| 3 |
Lugano
|
38 | 67 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 59:42 |
Sion
Super League 25/26, Relegation Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
Zurich
|
38 | 38 | 11 | 5 | 22 | 49:72 |
| 5 |
Grasshopper Club Zurich
|
38 | 33 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 48:74 |
| 6 |
Winterthur
|
38 | 23 | 5 | 8 | 25 | 44:100 |
Super League 25/26
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Thun
|
33 | 74 | 24 | 2 | 7 | 75:37 |
| 2 |
St. Gallen
|
33 | 60 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 64:40 |
| 3 |
Lugano
|
33 | 57 | 16 | 9 | 8 | 50:38 |
| 10 |
Zurich
|
33 | 34 | 10 | 4 | 19 | 45:63 |
| 11 |
Grasshopper Club Zurich
|
33 | 27 | 6 | 9 | 18 | 40:65 |
| 12 |
Winterthur
|
33 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 22 | 35:86 |
Luzern
Basel
Other matches of round
Match info
13:00
Saturday 14 March 2026
Switzerland, Thun,
Stockhorn Arena
Referee
Blanco Desiree
Switzerland
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Thun
4-4-2
Grasshopper Club Zurich
3-4-3
Starting
Thun
Substitutes
Manager
-
Lustrinelli M.
-
Messner G.
Thun
Grasshopper Club Zurich
![Grasshopper Club Zurich]()
Main Stats
2.4
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.69
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
3.53
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.88
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
1.04
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.35
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
4
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
0.88
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
3.53
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
-0.12
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
-1.47
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Thun
Grasshopper Club Zurich
![Grasshopper Club Zurich]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Super League
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Montolio G.
Defender
|
9.3 | 90 | 1 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.2 | 2 | 23/34(68%) | - | - |
Fehr F.
Defender
|
8.9 | 90 | - | 0.09 | 1 | 0.26 | 2 | 14/33(42%) | - | - |
Kait M.
Forward
|
8.2 | 77 | 1 | 0.4 | - | 0.01 | 3 | 14/24(58%) | - | - |
Labeau B.
Forward
|
8.1 | 70 | 1 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.01 | 1 | 6/11(55%) | - | - |
Plange L.
Forward
|
8 | 89 | - | 0.24 | 1 | 0.62 | 2 | 9/15(60%) | - | - |
Bertone L.
Midfielder
|
7.9 | 90 | - | 0.15 | 1 | 0.02 | 4 | 29/41(71%) | - | - |
|
Young-Jun L.
Forward
|
7.9 | 79 | 1 | 1.08 | - | 0.08 | 5 | 14/26(54%) | - | - |
Diaby A.
Defender
|
7.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.27 | - | 13/26(50%) | 1 | - |
Rastoder E.
Forward
|
7.5 | 64 | 1 | 0.98 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 6/10(60%) | - | - |
Abels D.
Defender
|
7.4 | 90 | - | 0.35 | - | 0.15 | 4 | 25/38(66%) | 1 | - |
Reichmuth N.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 26 | - | 0.23 | 1 | 0.15 | 1 | 10/14(71%) | 1 | - |
Bamert J.
Defender
|
7.2 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 15/25(60%) | - | - |
|
Dursun F.
Forward
|
7.2 | 20 | 1 | 0.49 | - | - | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
Heule M.
Defender
|
7 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 17/35(49%) | - | - |
Noah Rupp
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 26 | - | 0.06 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 7/11(64%) | - | - |
Imourane H.
Midfielder
|
6.8 | 90 | - | 0.13 | - | 0.03 | 2 | 28/35(80%) | - | - |
Clemente O.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | 5/6(83%) | - | - |
Steffen N.
Goalkeeper
|
6.7 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 6/16(38%) | - | - |
Krasniqi S.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 66 | - | 0.33 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 12/22(55%) | - | - |
Ibayi C.
Forward
|
6.5 | 26 | - | - | - | 0.09 | - | 6/10(60%) | - | - |
Franke D.
Defender
|
6.3 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | 4/9(44%) | - | - |
Meyer T.
Defender
|
6.2 | 90 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.27 | 1 | 19/27(70%) | - | - |
Diarrassouba S.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 24 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.01 | 2 | 5/7(71%) | - | - |
Stroscio S.
Midfielder
|
6.1 | 79 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 11/25(44%) | - | - |
|
Marques S.
Midfielder
|
6 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | - | - |
Meichtry F.
Midfielder
|
6 | 64 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 4/5(80%) | - | - |
Hammel J.
Goalkeeper
|
5.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 8/34(24%) | - | - |
Matoshi V.
Midfielder
|
5.6 | 64 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 5/9(56%) | 1 | - |
Tsimba F.
Forward
|
- | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Young-Jun L.
Forward
|
5 | 1 | 0.71 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | - |
|
Abels D.
Defender
|
4 | 1 | 0.14 | 1 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 |
|
Bertone L.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1 | 0.59 | 3 | - | - | 1 | 3 |
|
Kait M.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 0.98 | 1 | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Diarrassouba S.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 2 |
|
Dursun F.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Fehr F.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Heule M.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Imourane H.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Krasniqi S.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Montolio G.
Defender
|
2 | 1 | 0.52 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Plange L.
Forward
|
2 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Labeau B.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 0.24 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Meyer T.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Noah Rupp
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
|
Rastoder E.
Forward
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Reichmuth N.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Bamert J.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Clemente O.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Diaby A.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Franke D.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Hammel J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ibayi C.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Marques S.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Matoshi V.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Meichtry F.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Steffen N.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Stroscio S.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tsimba F.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Young-Jun L.
Forward
|
11 | 14/26(54%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 7/15(47%) | 43 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Abels D.
Defender
|
5 | 25/38(66%) | - | - | - | 0.15 | 9/14(64%) | 58 | 2/7(29%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 4 | - |
|
Montolio G.
Defender
|
5 | 23/34(68%) | - | - | 1 | 0.2 | 7/10(70%) | 49 | 6/13(46%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Bertone L.
Midfielder
|
3 | 29/41(71%) | - | - | 1 | 0.02 | 11/20(55%) | 60 | 2/9(22%) | - | 3/3(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Kait M.
Forward
|
3 | 14/24(58%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/11(36%) | 38 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Rastoder E.
Forward
|
3 | 6/10(60%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 4/5(80%) | 23 | - | - | 1/4(25%) | 2 | - |
|
Diaby A.
Defender
|
2 | 13/26(50%) | - | - | - | 0.27 | 3/11(27%) | 45 | 2/9(22%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Dursun F.
Forward
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Imourane H.
Midfielder
|
2 | 28/35(80%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 9/16(56%) | 48 | 3/4(75%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - |
|
Meyer T.
Defender
|
2 | 19/27(70%) | - | - | - | 0.27 | 8/13(62%) | 42 | - | 1/1(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 3 | - |
|
Plange L.
Forward
|
2 | 9/15(60%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.62 | 5/7(71%) | 41 | 1/1(100%) | 3/6(50%) | 3/5(60%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Fehr F.
Defender
|
1 | 14/33(42%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.26 | 6/17(35%) | 75 | 4/13(31%) | 3/11(27%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Krasniqi S.
Midfielder
|
1 | 12/22(55%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 6/13(46%) | 45 | 1/3(33%) | 1/2(50%) | 1/3(33%) | - | - |
|
Labeau B.
Forward
|
1 | 6/11(55%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.01 | 3/6(50%) | 26 | - | - | - | 4 | 1 |
|
Noah Rupp
Midfielder
|
1 | 7/11(64%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/6(50%) | 19 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Reichmuth N.
Midfielder
|
1 | 10/14(71%) | - | 1 | 1 | 0.15 | 2/4(50%) | 22 | 2/4(50%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Stroscio S.
Midfielder
|
1 | 11/25(44%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/14(43%) | 47 | 1/4(25%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Bamert J.
Defender
|
- | 15/25(60%) | - | - | - | - | 1/3(33%) | 42 | 1/6(17%) | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Clemente O.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/6(83%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 11 | - | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - |
|
Diarrassouba S.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/7(71%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/4(75%) | 19 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - |
|
Franke D.
Defender
|
- | 4/9(44%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 13 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Hammel J.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 8/34(24%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/13(23%) | 41 | 8/34(24%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Heule M.
Defender
|
- | 17/35(49%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 9/19(47%) | 75 | 3/10(30%) | - | 2/4(50%) | 3 | - |
|
Ibayi C.
Forward
|
- | 6/10(60%) | 1 | - | - | 0.09 | 2/4(50%) | 16 | 1/2(50%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Marques S.
Midfielder
|
- | 1/5(20%) | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Matoshi V.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/9(56%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/4(75%) | 16 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Meichtry F.
Midfielder
|
- | 4/5(80%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 19 | 1/1(100%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Steffen N.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 6/16(38%) | - | - | - | - | - | 23 | 1/11(9%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Tsimba F.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Heule M.
Defender
|
18 | 1/1(100%) | 10/17(59%) | 3 | 3/5(60%) | 2 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Meyer T.
Defender
|
18 | - | 5/13(38%) | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Plange L.
Forward
|
18 | 2/5(40%) | 5/13(38%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Labeau B.
Forward
|
16 | 2/7(29%) | 5/9(56%) | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Montolio G.
Defender
|
15 | 5/8(63%) | 6/7(86%) | - | 4/4(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Diaby A.
Defender
|
14 | 4/6(67%) | 4/8(50%) | 3 | 3/3(100%) | 2 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Abels D.
Defender
|
12 | 1/2(50%) | 7/10(70%) | - | - | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Kait M.
Forward
|
12 | 4/5(80%) | 2/7(29%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Bamert J.
Defender
|
11 | 4/4(100%) | 3/7(43%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | 4 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Rastoder E.
Forward
|
11 | - | 4/10(40%) | 3 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Stroscio S.
Midfielder
|
11 | 1/2(50%) | 6/9(67%) | 2 | 3/4(75%) | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Fehr F.
Defender
|
10 | - | 7/9(78%) | - | 5/5(100%) | 3 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Krasniqi S.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 4/8(50%) | 1 | 3/3(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Bertone L.
Midfielder
|
9 | 1/1(100%) | 6/8(75%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Young-Jun L.
Forward
|
9 | 2/5(40%) | - | 1 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Imourane H.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 4/7(57%) | - | 1/3(33%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Matoshi V.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 1/6(17%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Meichtry F.
Midfielder
|
7 | 1/2(100%) | 2/5(40%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Clemente O.
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 3/6(50%) | 2 | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Noah Rupp
Midfielder
|
6 | - | 3/6(50%) | - | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Diarrassouba S.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 2/5(40%) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ibayi C.
Forward
|
4 | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Reichmuth N.
Midfielder
|
4 | 1/1(100%) | 1/3(33%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Dursun F.
Forward
|
3 | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Franke D.
Defender
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Hammel J.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Marques S.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Tsimba F.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Steffen N.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Steffen N.
Goalkeeper
|
-0.15 | 1 | 0.85 | 1 | - | 6 | - |
|
Hammel J.
Goalkeeper
|
-1.27 | 2 | 3.73 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the Super League tournament, the teams Thun and Grasshopper Club Zurich will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Thun - Stockhorn Arena. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Switzerland, 14 Mar 2026 at 13:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Thun. Team line-up:
- Goalkeeper: Steffen Niklas
- Right back: Fehr Fabio
- Central defender: Montolio Genis
- Central defender: Bamert Jan
- Left back: Heule Michael
- Right winger: Matoshi Valmir
- Central midfielder: Bertone Leonardo
- Central midfielder: Kait Mattias
- Left winger: Meichtry Franz Ethan
- Striker: Labeau Brighton
- Striker: Rastoder Elmin
- Goalkeeper: Hammel Justin Pete
- Central defender: Mikulic Luka
- Central defender: Ngom Mouhamed El Bachir
- Central defender: Diaby Abdoulaye
- Central midfielder: Abels Dirk
- Central midfielder: Imourane Hassane
- Left winger: Krasniqi Samuel
- Striker: Plange Luke
- Right winger: Stroscio Simone
- Striker: Meyer Tim
- Striker: Young-Jun Lee
Thun vs. Grasshopper Club Zurich match info: Tournament - Super League. Match start date - 14 Mar 2026. Match start time - 13:00.
