More
Internazionale Milano (Women) - Fcf Como (Women) 16.05.2026
Serie A, Women
Round 22
Sat 16 May 2026
-
12:00
Finished
0
3
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
2
1st HALF
H2H Statistics
Internazionale Milano (Women)
Fcf Como (Women)
![Fcf Como (Women)]()
4 wins
1 draws
3 wins
Head to head
Chat
Internazionale Milano (Women)
DRAW
Fcf Como (Women)
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Internazionale Milano (Women)
No goal
34%
Fcf Como (Women)
Predictions
The upcoming Serie A, Women (Italy) clash between Internazionale Milano (Women) and Fcf Como (Women) will be taking place on 16.05 at 12:00. Sports bettors can review detailed Internazionale Milano (Women) v Fcf Como (Women) betting tips and analysis of both teams' statistics to make an informed prediction for the match.
3 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in all competitions, at least one team did not score
5 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in Serie A, Women, at least one team has not scored
2 / 7 of the last matches between the teams, at least one of the teams did not score
7 / 10 of last matches Fcf Como (Women) in all competitions, at least one team did not score
7 / 10 of last matches Fcf Como (Women) in Serie A, Women, at least one team has not scored
5 / 10 of last matches Internazionale Milano (Women) in all tournaments ended with her victory
Standings
Serie A, Women 25/26
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Res Roma (Women)
|
22 | 55 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 44:19 |
| 2 |
Internazionale Milano (Women)
|
22 | 44 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 49:26 |
| 3 |
Juventus (Women)
|
22 | 39 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 33:19 |
| 7 |
Napoli (Women)
|
22 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 30:25 |
| 8 |
Fcf Como (Women)
|
22 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 24:22 |
| 9 |
US Sassuolo (Women)
|
22 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 17:34 |
Fiorentina (Women)
Ternana (Women)
Parma (Women)
Other matches of round
Match info
12:00
Saturday 16 May 2026Discipline
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
8.2 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | - | 30/37(81%) | - | - |
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/40(60%) | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
7.3 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/27(89%) | - | - |
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 89 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.06 | 1 | 37/37(100%) | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 14 | - | 0.2 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 8/9(89%) | - | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
6.4 | 45 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 14/16(88%) | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
6.1 | 31 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.04 | 2 | 8/10(80%) | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
4 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 40/51(78%) | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.04 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
2 | 14/16(88%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 5/6(83%) | 32 | 1/2(50%) | 1/7(14%) | - | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | 8/9(89%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/4(100%) | 12 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
1 | 8/10(80%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 6/7(86%) | 15 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 24/40(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 1/17(6%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
- | 37/37(100%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 15/15(100%) | 45 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
- | 24/27(89%) | - | - | - | - | 1/2(50%) | 45 | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 40/51(78%) | - | - | - | - | - | 57 | 7/17(41%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
- | 30/37(81%) | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | 10/12(83%) | 48 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vaitukaityte L.
Midfielder
|
14 | 1/1(100%) | 7/13(54%) | 4 | 6/6(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - |
|
Howard S.
Defender
|
6 | 3/3(100%) | 2/3(67%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | 12 | - | - | - |
|
Chidiac A.
Midfielder
|
4 | - | 1/4(25%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Glionna B.
Forward
|
3 | 1/1(100%) | 1/2(50%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Csiszar H.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | - |
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Wullaert T.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Capelleti A.
Goalkeeper
|
0.24 | 3 | 0.24 | - | - | 2 | - |
|
Ivarsdottir T.
Goalkeeper
|
-2.16 | 1 | 0.84 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Italy, 16 May 2026 at 12:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Internazionale Milano (Women). The football team Fcf Como (Women). The teams have played 8 of the games all the time. Of these, Internazionale Milano (Women) won 4, and Fcf Como (Women) won 3, with a total of 1 draw games.
Internazionale Milano (Women) vs. Fcf Como (Women) match info: Tournament - Serie A, Women. Match start date - 16 May 2026. Match start time - 12:00.
