More
Ashdod - Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem 13.05.2026
Statistics
0.98
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.92
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Ashdod
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
![Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem]()
4 wins
4 draws
7 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Ashdod
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
![Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Premier League
Match facts
During the last 14 meetings with MS Ashdod playing at home, MS Ashdod have won 4 times, there have been 4 draws while Hapoel Jerusalem FC have won 6 times.
During the last 22 meetings, MS Ashdod have won 7 times, there have been 5 draws while Hapoel Jerusalem FC have won 10 times.
MS Ashdod haven't won in their last 9 games.
MS Ashdod have a losing streak of 4 matches at home.
MS Ashdod have played 10 home matches in a row without winning.
Show more
Ashdod
DRAW
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Ashdod
No goal
34%
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
Predictions
The Ashdod vs Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem match in the Israel Premier League is set to begin on 13.05 at 13:00. For those interested in sports betting, they can use in-depth Ashdod Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem betting tips by analyzing the statistics and making a prediction for the match.
1 / 10 of last matches Ashdod in Premier League ended with her victory
3 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Ashdod
5 / 10 of her last matches Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem in Premier League ended in defeat
8 / 10 of last matches in all competitions Ashdod did not draw
8 / 10 of last matches in Premier League Ashdod did not draw
Standings
Premier League 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 |
Hapoel Haifa
|
26 | 25 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 31:44 |
| 9 |
Hapoel Ironi Kiryat Shmona
|
26 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 37:46 |
| 11 |
Ashdod
|
26 | 24 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 32:50 |
| 12 |
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
|
26 | 21 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 22:37 |
| 13 |
Ironi Tiberias
|
26 | 19 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 32:52 |
| 14 |
Maccabi Bnei Raina
|
26 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 17:59 |
Premier League 25/26, Relegation Round
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 |
Bnei Sakhnin
|
33 | 34 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 28:49 |
| 4 |
Hapoel Haifa
|
33 | 34 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 39:51 |
| 6 |
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
|
33 | 31 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 26:43 |
| 7 |
Ashdod
|
33 | 28 | 6 | 10 | 17 | 38:62 |
| 8 |
Maccabi Bnei Raina
|
33 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 23 | 26:69 |
Maccabi Netanya
Other matches of round
Match info
13:00
Wednesday 13 May 2026
Ashdod
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
![Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem]()
Main Stats
0.98
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.92
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.43
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.04
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
0.92
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.43
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
1.04
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.43
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.04
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
1.43
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Ashdod
Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem
![Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Premier League
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ansah E.
Forward
|
7.3 | 90 | - | 0.63 | - | 0.14 | 2 | 21/27(78%) | - | - |
Cohen A.
Forward
|
6.8 | 61 | - | - | - | 0.08 | - | 25/34(74%) | - | - |
|
Mendy A.
Defender
|
6.7 | 84 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.03 | 1 | 50/65(77%) | - | - |
|
Harel S.
Forward
|
6.6 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 5/10(50%) | - | - |
|
Tamam I.
Midfielder
|
6.6 | 20 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 6/6(100%) | - | - |
|
Niemczycki K.
Goalkeeper
|
6.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 25/31(81%) | - | - |
|
Badash G.
Midfielder
|
6.4 | 72 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.05 | 2 | 2/9(22%) | - | - |
Rakoniats M.
Forward
|
6.3 | 33 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 7/10(70%) | 1 | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ansah E.
Forward
|
2 | 1 | 0.11 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 |
|
Badash G.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
Mendy A.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Cohen A.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Harel S.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Niemczycki K.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rakoniats M.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tamam I.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ansah E.
Forward
|
5 | 21/27(78%) | - | 1 | - | 0.14 | 8/12(67%) | 51 | 1/1(100%) | 2/7(29%) | 3/6(50%) | 1 | 1 |
|
Cohen A.
Forward
|
1 | 25/34(74%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 6/14(43%) | 51 | 1/7(14%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - |
|
Harel S.
Forward
|
1 | 5/10(50%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 1/5(20%) | 30 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Badash G.
Midfielder
|
- | 2/9(22%) | - | - | - | 0.05 | - | 32 | - | 2/4(50%) | 1/2(50%) | 4 | - |
|
Mendy A.
Defender
|
- | 50/65(77%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 13/20(65%) | 89 | 5/14(36%) | 1/3(33%) | - | - | - |
|
Niemczycki K.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 25/31(81%) | - | - | - | - | 1/6(17%) | 41 | 5/11(45%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Rakoniats M.
Forward
|
- | 7/10(70%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/3(67%) | 15 | - | - | - | 2 | 1 |
|
Tamam I.
Midfielder
|
- | 6/6(100%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/4(100%) | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ansah E.
Forward
|
12 | 1/3(33%) | 4/9(44%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Badash G.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 6/10(60%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Rakoniats M.
Forward
|
6 | - | 2/6(33%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Harel S.
Forward
|
5 | 1/1(100%) | 3/4(75%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | 3 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Cohen A.
Forward
|
3 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | 2/2(100%) | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Mendy A.
Defender
|
3 | - | 1/3(33%) | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Niemczycki K.
Goalkeeper
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Tamam I.
Midfielder
|
2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Niemczycki K.
Goalkeeper
|
0.42 | 1 | 1.42 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Israel, 13 May 2026 at 13:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Ashdod. The football team Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem. The teams have played 15 of the games all the time. Of these, Ashdod won 4, and Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem won 7, with a total of 4 draw games.
Ashdod vs. Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem match info: Tournament - Premier League. Match start date - 13 May 2026. Match start time - 13:00.
