More
Arges Pitesti - Farul Constanta 22.02.2026
Match details
2nd HALF
0
:
0
Statistics
1.43
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.58
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
H2H Statistics
Arges Pitesti
Farul Constanta
![Farul Constanta]()
4 wins
4 draws
7 wins
Head to head
Chat
Top Scorers
Arges Pitesti
Farul Constanta
![Farul Constanta]()
Statistics from 25/26 season of Superliga
Match facts
During the last 8 meetings with ACS Champions FC Arges playing at home, ACS Champions FC Arges have won 2 times, there have been 2 draws while FC Farul Constanta have won 4 times. The goal difference is 9-8 in favour of FC Farul Constanta.
During the last 17 meetings, ACS Champions FC Arges have won 3 times, there have been 4 draws while FC Farul Constanta have won 10 times. The goal difference is 25-12 in favour of FC Farul Constanta.
Did you know that ACS Champions FC Arges scores 29% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?
Did you know that FC Farul Constanta scores 23% of their goals between the minutes 31-45?
ACS Champions FC Arges haven't scored in 4 of their 13 home matches in Superliga this season.
Show more
Arges Pitesti
DRAW
Farul Constanta
Will both teams score?
YES
50%
NO
50%
Who will score first?
Arges Pitesti
No goal
34%
Farul Constanta
Predictions
The Arges Pitesti vs Farul Constanta match in the Romania Superliga is set to begin on 22.02 at 08:00. For those interested in sports betting, they can use in-depth Arges Pitesti Farul Constanta betting tips by analyzing the statistics and making a prediction for the match.
4 / 10 of last matches Arges Pitesti in all tournaments ended with her victory
5 / 10 of last matches Arges Pitesti in Superliga ended with her victory
2 / 10 of last matches between the teams ended in victory Arges Pitesti
4 / 10 of her last matches Farul Constanta in all competitions ended in defeat
5 / 10 of last matches Farul Constanta in Superliga ended in defeat
4 / 10 of last matches Arges Pitesti in all competitions, at least one team did not score
Standings
Superliga 25/26
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 |
Dinamo Bucuresti
|
30 | 52 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 42:28 |
| 6 |
Arges Pitesti
|
30 | 50 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 37:28 |
| 7 |
FCSB
|
30 | 46 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 48:40 |
| 10 |
Otelul Galati
|
30 | 41 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 39:32 |
| 11 |
Farul Constanta
|
30 | 37 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 39:37 |
| 12 |
Petrolul Ploiesti
|
30 | 32 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 24:31 |
Botosani
CFR Cluj
Unirea Slobozia
Superliga 25/26, Championship Round
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
Dinamo Bucuresti
|
10 | 39 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13:12 |
| 5 |
Rapid Bucuresti 1923
|
10 | 34 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8:14 |
| 6 |
Arges Pitesti
|
10 | 32 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6:10 |
Universitatea Cluj
Superliga 25/26, Relegation Round
Show full standings
| # | Team | G | Pts | W | D | L | G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 |
Petrolul Ploiesti
|
9 | 25 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9:15 |
| 7 |
Farul Constanta
|
9 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8:11 |
| 8 |
Hermannstadt
|
9 | 25 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 13:10 |
Other matches of round
Match info
08:00
Sunday 22 February 2026
Romania, Mioveni,
Stadionul Mioveni
Referee
Kovacs Istvan
Romania
Lineups
Lineups
Starting
Arges Pitesti
4-3-3
Farul Constanta
4-3-3
Starting
Arges Pitesti
Substitutes
Manager
-
Andone B.
-
Zicu I.
Arges Pitesti
Farul Constanta
![Farul Constanta]()
Main Stats
1.43
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
0.58
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Shots
1.39
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.01
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Passes
1.11
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
0.67
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Attacking
2
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
1
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Defending
Goalkeeping
0.01
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.39
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.01
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.39
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Top Scorers
Arges Pitesti
Farul Constanta
![Farul Constanta]()
#
Goals
Statistics from 25/26 season of Superliga
Player Statistics
Overview
Shots
Attack
Defending
Goalkeeping
Overview
| Player | Grade | Minutes played | Goals | xG | Assists | xA | Total shots | Passes | Yellow cards | Red cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oancea D.
Defender
|
8.6 | 90 | - | 0.12 | - | 0.07 | 3 | 30/43(70%) | - | - |
Garutti G.
Defender
|
8.1 | 90 | - | 0.28 | - | 0.12 | 2 | 15/26(58%) | - | - |
Tudose M.
Defender
|
8 | 90 | - | - | 1 | 0.34 | - | 20/27(74%) | 1 | - |
Matos R.
Forward
|
7.9 | 85 | 1 | 0.65 | - | 0.03 | 3 | 17/20(85%) | - | - |
Borta F.
Midfielder
|
7.8 | 90 | - | 0.01 | - | - | 1 | 21/28(75%) | - | - |
Cabuz C.
Goalkeeper
|
7.5 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 7/23(30%) | - | - |
Sierra R.
Midfielder
|
7.3 | 90 | - | 0.2 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 22/31(71%) | - | - |
Micovschi C.
Forward
|
7.3 | 45 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.29 | 1 | 8/13(62%) | - | - |
Munteanu R.
Goalkeeper
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | - | - | 24/36(67%) | - | - |
Radescu I.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 45 | - | 0.03 | - | - | 1 | 4/9(44%) | - | - |
Sirbu D.
Midfielder
|
6.9 | 90 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 36/45(80%) | - | - |
Bettaieb A.
Forward
|
6.8 | 77 | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 18/21(86%) | - | - |
Tiru B.
Defender
|
6.8 | 72 | - | - | - | - | - | 23/25(92%) | - | - |
Grigoryan N.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 28 | - | - | - | 0.38 | - | 5/8(63%) | - | - |
Ramalho D.
Midfielder
|
6.7 | 18 | - | - | - | 0.08 | - | 15/17(88%) | - | - |
Moldoveanu R.
Forward
|
6.6 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 7/15(47%) | - | - |
Briceag M.
Defender
|
6.6 | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Markovic J.
Forward
|
6.5 | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/5(40%) | - | - |
Pirvu Y.
Forward
|
6.4 | 45 | - | 0.04 | - | - | 1 | 8/14(57%) | - | - |
Dican V.
Defender
|
6.4 | 90 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.04 | 1 | 54/64(84%) | - | - |
Seto T.
Midfielder
|
6.3 | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | 3/5(60%) | - | - |
Radaslavescu E.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 45 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.01 | 1 | 16/18(89%) | - | - |
Vina I.
Midfielder
|
6.2 | 86 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.06 | 1 | 46/56(82%) | - | - |
Pellegrini L.
Midfielder
|
6 | 62 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 9/12(75%) | - | - |
Rata V.
Midfielder
|
6 | 79 | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | 16/19(84%) | - | - |
Isfan A.
Midfielder
|
5.8 | 72 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 11/14(79%) | - | - |
Tanasa R.
Midfielder
|
5.7 | 45 | - | - | - | 0.01 | - | 9/10(90%) | - | - |
Doicaru I.
Forward
|
- | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 2/2(100%) | - | - |
Luckassen K.
Forward
|
- | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It’s calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team’s total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Shots
| Player | Total shots | Shots on target | xGOT | Shots off target | Blocked shots | Shots header | Shots inside the Box | Shots outside the Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Matos R.
Forward
|
3 | 2 | 1.37 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 1 |
|
Oancea D.
Defender
|
3 | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 2 |
|
Garutti G.
Defender
|
2 | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | - |
|
Borta F.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Dican V.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Micovschi C.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Pirvu Y.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Radaslavescu E.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Radescu I.
Midfielder
|
1 | 1 | 0.02 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Sierra R.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
|
Vina I.
Midfielder
|
1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
|
Bettaieb A.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Briceag M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cabuz C.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Doicaru I.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Grigoryan N.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Isfan A.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Luckassen K.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Markovic J.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Moldoveanu R.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Munteanu R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pellegrini L.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Ramalho D.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Rata V.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Seto T.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sirbu D.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tanasa R.
Midfielder
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tiru B.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Tudose M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
xGOT - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution — shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. — after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team’s total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
Attack
| Player | Touches in the opposition Box | Passes | Big chances created | Big chances missed | Assists | xA | Passes in final third | Touches | Passes long | Crosses | Successful dribbles | Fouled | Offsides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Matos R.
Forward
|
4 | 17/20(85%) | - | 1 | - | 0.03 | 7/10(70%) | 29 | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | 2 |
|
Tanasa R.
Midfielder
|
4 | 9/10(90%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 2/2(100%) | 25 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Garutti G.
Defender
|
3 | 15/26(58%) | - | - | - | 0.12 | 5/13(38%) | 39 | 6/15(40%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Oancea D.
Defender
|
3 | 30/43(70%) | - | - | - | 0.07 | 10/20(50%) | 79 | 4/10(40%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 2 | - |
|
Markovic J.
Forward
|
2 | 2/5(40%) | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | - | - | 2/3(67%) | - | 1 |
|
Isfan A.
Midfielder
|
1 | 11/14(79%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/5(80%) | 25 | - | - | - | 3 | - |
|
Micovschi C.
Forward
|
1 | 8/13(62%) | 1 | - | - | 0.29 | 5/9(56%) | 30 | - | 1/5(20%) | - | - | 1 |
|
Moldoveanu R.
Forward
|
1 | 7/15(47%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 4/9(44%) | 26 | 2/5(40%) | - | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
|
Radaslavescu E.
Midfielder
|
1 | 16/18(89%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/5(60%) | 24 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Radescu I.
Midfielder
|
1 | 4/9(44%) | - | - | - | - | 1/5(20%) | 19 | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Sierra R.
Midfielder
|
1 | 22/31(71%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/9(33%) | 46 | 2/8(25%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Tudose M.
Defender
|
1 | 20/27(74%) | 1 | - | 1 | 0.34 | 4/6(67%) | 41 | 3/7(43%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Bettaieb A.
Forward
|
- | 18/21(86%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 10/13(77%) | 36 | 1/1(100%) | 1/1(33%) | 2/4(50%) | - | - |
|
Borta F.
Midfielder
|
- | 21/28(75%) | - | - | - | - | 6/9(67%) | 50 | 2/6(33%) | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Briceag M.
Defender
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cabuz C.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 7/23(30%) | - | - | - | - | 3/10(30%) | 32 | 6/22(27%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Dican V.
Defender
|
- | 54/64(84%) | - | - | - | 0.04 | 8/12(67%) | 77 | 3/4(75%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
|
Doicaru I.
Forward
|
- | 2/2(100%) | - | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | 2 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
Grigoryan N.
Midfielder
|
- | 5/8(63%) | 1 | - | - | 0.38 | 1/4(25%) | 20 | - | 1/3(33%) | 1/1(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Luckassen K.
Forward
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Munteanu R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | 24/36(67%) | - | - | - | - | 1/7(14%) | 40 | 9/21(43%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Pellegrini L.
Midfielder
|
- | 9/12(75%) | - | - | - | 0.01 | 3/4(75%) | 32 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pirvu Y.
Forward
|
- | 8/14(57%) | - | - | - | - | 2/6(33%) | 25 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
|
Ramalho D.
Midfielder
|
- | 15/17(88%) | - | - | - | 0.08 | 6/8(75%) | 21 | 2/3(67%) | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - |
|
Rata V.
Midfielder
|
- | 16/19(84%) | - | - | - | 0.1 | 8/11(73%) | 35 | - | 3/7(43%) | - | 1 | - |
|
Seto T.
Midfielder
|
- | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | 2/3(67%) | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Sirbu D.
Midfielder
|
- | 36/45(80%) | - | - | - | 0.03 | 6/8(75%) | 83 | 1/8(13%) | 1/3(33%) | 2/2(100%) | 1 | - |
|
Tiru B.
Defender
|
- | 23/25(92%) | - | - | - | - | 2/4(50%) | 40 | 2/4(50%) | - | - | - | - |
|
Vina I.
Midfielder
|
- | 46/56(82%) | - | - | - | 0.06 | 11/15(73%) | 71 | 2/4(50%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | - |
xA - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver’s position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player’s or team’s total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Defending
| Player | Duels | Aerial duels | Ground duels | Foules | Tackles | Interceptions | Clearances | Error leading to goal | Error leading to shot | Own goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dican V.
Defender
|
11 | 3/7(43%) | 3/4(75%) | - | - | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Oancea D.
Defender
|
11 | - | 8/11(73%) | 1 | 4/5(80%) | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
|
Rata V.
Midfielder
|
11 | - | 2/9(22%) | 2 | 1/1(100%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Sirbu D.
Midfielder
|
11 | 1/1(100%) | 6/10(60%) | 1 | 1/3(33%) | 3 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Borta F.
Midfielder
|
10 | 2/2(100%) | 4/8(50%) | 4 | 1/3(33%) | 3 | 11 | - | - | - |
|
Vina I.
Midfielder
|
10 | - | 4/9(44%) | 1 | 2/2(100%) | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Matos R.
Forward
|
9 | 3/7(43%) | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Garutti G.
Defender
|
8 | 5/5(100%) | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 5 | - | - | - |
|
Isfan A.
Midfielder
|
8 | 1/3(33%) | 3/5(60%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Moldoveanu R.
Forward
|
8 | - | 4/6(67%) | - | 1/2(50%) | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Tiru B.
Defender
|
8 | 2/5(40%) | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 10 | - | - | - |
|
Bettaieb A.
Forward
|
7 | 1/1(100%) | 3/6(75%) | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Radescu I.
Midfielder
|
7 | 2/2(100%) | 3/5(60%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Sierra R.
Midfielder
|
7 | 3/4(75%) | 2/3(67%) | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Tanasa R.
Midfielder
|
7 | - | 2/7(29%) | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Markovic J.
Forward
|
6 | - | 2/3(67%) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Grigoryan N.
Midfielder
|
5 | - | 4/5(80%) | 1 | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pellegrini L.
Midfielder
|
5 | 1/1(100%) | 1/4(25%) | 1 | - | 1 | 7 | - | - | - |
|
Tudose M.
Defender
|
4 | 2/2(100%) | 1/2(50%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | 3 | 6 | - | - | - |
|
Radaslavescu E.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Seto T.
Midfielder
|
3 | - | 1/3(33%) | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Luckassen K.
Forward
|
2 | - | 1/1(100%) | 1 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Pirvu Y.
Forward
|
2 | - | 1/2(50%) | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Ramalho D.
Midfielder
|
2 | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
|
Briceag M.
Defender
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - |
|
Doicaru I.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Micovschi C.
Forward
|
1 | - | - | - | 1/1(100%) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Cabuz C.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
|
Munteanu R.
Goalkeeper
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Goalkeeping
| Player | Goals prevented | Goalkeeper saves | xGOT faced | Goals Conceded | Punches | Throws | Sweeper keeper actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Munteanu R.
Goalkeeper
|
0.39 | 2 | 1.39 | 1 | - | 2 | - |
|
Cabuz C.
Goalkeeper
|
0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | - | 1 | 4 | - |
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot’s quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team’s total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
As part of the Superliga tournament, the teams Arges Pitesti and Farul Constanta will play a football match at the home stadium of the team Arges Pitesti - Stadionul Mioveni. As a reminder, the next game between football clubs will be held in Romania, 22 Feb 2026 at 08:00. On 777score.com, every football fan will be able to see the football match results, complete statistics of players and teams, and find out the schedule of future teams' games. General information The football team Arges Pitesti. Team line-up:
- Left back: Borta Florin
- Central defender: Garutti Guilherme
- Central defender: Tudose Mario
- Right back: Oancea Dorinel
- Goalkeeper: Cabuz Catalin
- Central midfielder: Sierra Rober
- Central midfielder: Rata Vadim
- Striker: Bettaieb Adel
- Striker: Matos Ricardo
- Striker: Micovschi Claudiu
- Central midfielder: Pirvu Yanis
- Striker: Ganea Cristian
- Striker: Alibec Denis
- Goalkeeper: Munteanu Rafael
- Right back: Sirbu Dan
- Central defender: Tiru Bogdan
- Central defender: Marins Gustavo
- Left back: Pellegrini Lucas
- Central midfielder: Dican Victor
- Central midfielder: Vina Ionut
- Striker: Isfan Alexandru
- Central midfielder: Radaslavescu Eduard
Arges Pitesti vs. Farul Constanta match info: Tournament - Superliga. Match start date - 22 Feb 2026. Match start time - 08:00.
